netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, pabeni@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 05/10] rxrpc: Don't check RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST after calling rxrpc_rotate_tx_window()
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:47:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <153903887596.17944.993399685251632858.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153903883882.17944.17642727588248415623.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

We should only call the function to end a call's Tx phase if we rotated the
marked-last packet out of the transmission buffer.

Make rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() return an indication of whether it just
rotated the packet marked as the last out of the transmit buffer, carrying
the information out of the locked section in that function.

We can then check the return value instead of examining RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST.

Fixes: 70790dbe3f66 ("rxrpc: Pass the last Tx packet marker in the annotation buffer")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/input.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c
index 2dcef482acf2..8834aa627371 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -216,10 +216,11 @@ static void rxrpc_send_ping(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
 /*
  * Apply a hard ACK by advancing the Tx window.
  */
-static void rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(struct rxrpc_call *call, rxrpc_seq_t to,
+static bool rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(struct rxrpc_call *call, rxrpc_seq_t to,
 				   struct rxrpc_ack_summary *summary)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *list = NULL;
+	bool rot_last = false;
 	int ix;
 	u8 annotation;
 
@@ -243,15 +244,17 @@ static void rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(struct rxrpc_call *call, rxrpc_seq_t to,
 		skb->next = list;
 		list = skb;
 
-		if (annotation & RXRPC_TX_ANNO_LAST)
+		if (annotation & RXRPC_TX_ANNO_LAST) {
 			set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags);
+			rot_last = true;
+		}
 		if ((annotation & RXRPC_TX_ANNO_MASK) != RXRPC_TX_ANNO_ACK)
 			summary->nr_rot_new_acks++;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&call->lock);
 
-	trace_rxrpc_transmit(call, (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags) ?
+	trace_rxrpc_transmit(call, (rot_last ?
 				    rxrpc_transmit_rotate_last :
 				    rxrpc_transmit_rotate));
 	wake_up(&call->waitq);
@@ -262,6 +265,8 @@ static void rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(struct rxrpc_call *call, rxrpc_seq_t to,
 		skb->next = NULL;
 		rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_tx_freed);
 	}
+
+	return rot_last;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -332,11 +337,11 @@ static bool rxrpc_receiving_reply(struct rxrpc_call *call)
 		trace_rxrpc_timer(call, rxrpc_timer_init_for_reply, now);
 	}
 
-	if (!test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags))
-		rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, top, &summary);
 	if (!test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags)) {
-		rxrpc_proto_abort("TXL", call, top);
-		return false;
+		if (!rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, top, &summary)) {
+			rxrpc_proto_abort("TXL", call, top);
+			return false;
+		}
 	}
 	if (!rxrpc_end_tx_phase(call, true, "ETD"))
 		return false;
@@ -897,8 +902,12 @@ static void rxrpc_input_ack(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (nr_acks > call->tx_top - hard_ack)
 		return rxrpc_proto_abort("AKN", call, 0);
 
-	if (after(hard_ack, call->tx_hard_ack))
-		rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, hard_ack, &summary);
+	if (after(hard_ack, call->tx_hard_ack)) {
+		if (rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, hard_ack, &summary)) {
+			rxrpc_end_tx_phase(call, false, "ETA");
+			return;
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (nr_acks > 0) {
 		if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, buf.acks, nr_acks) < 0)
@@ -907,11 +916,6 @@ static void rxrpc_input_ack(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				      &summary);
 	}
 
-	if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags)) {
-		rxrpc_end_tx_phase(call, false, "ETA");
-		return;
-	}
-
 	if (call->rxtx_annotations[call->tx_top & RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_MASK] &
 	    RXRPC_TX_ANNO_LAST &&
 	    summary.nr_acks == call->tx_top - hard_ack &&
@@ -933,8 +937,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_ackall(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	_proto("Rx ACKALL %%%u", sp->hdr.serial);
 
-	rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, call->tx_top, &summary);
-	if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags))
+	if (rxrpc_rotate_tx_window(call, call->tx_top, &summary))
 		rxrpc_end_tx_phase(call, false, "ETL");
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-08 22:47 [PATCH net 00/10] rxrpc: Fix packet reception code David Howells
2018-10-08 22:47 ` [PATCH net 01/10] rxrpc: Fix some missed refs to init_net David Howells
2018-10-08 22:47 ` [PATCH net 02/10] rxrpc: Fix the data_ready handler David Howells
2018-10-08 22:47 ` [PATCH net 03/10] rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook David Howells
2018-10-08 22:47 ` [PATCH net 04/10] rxrpc: Don't need to take the RCU read lock in the packet receiver David Howells
2018-10-08 22:47 ` David Howells [this message]
2018-10-08 22:48 ` [PATCH net 06/10] rxrpc: Carry call state out of locked section in rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() David Howells
2018-10-08 22:48 ` [PATCH net 07/10] rxrpc: Only take the rwind and mtu values from latest ACK David Howells
2018-10-08 22:48 ` [PATCH net 08/10] rxrpc: Fix connection-level abort handling David Howells
2018-10-08 22:48 ` [PATCH net 09/10] rxrpc: Fix the rxrpc_tx_packet trace line David Howells
2018-10-08 22:48 ` [PATCH net 10/10] rxrpc: Fix the packet reception routine David Howells
2018-10-08 23:00 ` [PATCH net 00/10] rxrpc: Fix packet reception code David Howells
2018-10-08 23:41 ` [PATCH net 10/10] rxrpc: Fix the packet reception routine David Howells
2018-10-09 14:00 ` [PATCH net 02/10] rxrpc: Fix the data_ready handler David Howells
2018-10-11  5:28 ` [PATCH net 00/10] rxrpc: Fix packet reception code David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=153903887596.17944.993399685251632858.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).