netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Olivier Tilmans <olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/28] tcp: move tcp_in_ack_event later
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:43:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1584524612-24470-4-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584524612-24470-1-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>

From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi>

Accurate ECN's heuristics does not know if there is going
to be ACE field based CE counter increase or not until after
rtx queue has been processed. Only then the number of ACKed
bytes/pkts is available.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 3525ec8edd54..860938e0f1b6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3539,12 +3539,23 @@ static void tcp_process_tlp_ack(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, int flag)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void tcp_in_ack_event(struct sock *sk, u32 flags)
+static inline void tcp_in_ack_event(struct sock *sk, int flag)
 {
 	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
 
-	if (icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event)
-		icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event(sk, flags);
+	if (icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event) {
+		u32 ack_ev_flags = 0;
+
+		if (flag & FLAG_WIN_UPDATE)
+			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE;
+		if (flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) {
+			ack_ev_flags = CA_ACK_SLOWPATH;
+			if (flag & FLAG_ECE)
+				ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_ECE;
+		}
+
+		icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event(sk, ack_ev_flags);
+	}
 }
 
 /* Congestion control has updated the cwnd already. So if we're in
@@ -3657,12 +3668,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 		tcp_snd_una_update(tp, ack);
 		flag |= FLAG_WIN_UPDATE;
 
-		tcp_in_ack_event(sk, CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE);
-
 		NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPHPACKS);
 	} else {
-		u32 ack_ev_flags = CA_ACK_SLOWPATH;
-
 		if (ack_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)
 			flag |= FLAG_DATA;
 		else
@@ -3674,15 +3681,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 			flag |= tcp_sacktag_write_queue(sk, skb, prior_snd_una,
 							&sack_state);
 
-		if (tcp_ecn_rcv_ecn_echo(tp, tcp_hdr(skb))) {
+		if (tcp_ecn_rcv_ecn_echo(tp, tcp_hdr(skb)))
 			flag |= FLAG_ECE;
-			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_ECE;
-		}
-
-		if (flag & FLAG_WIN_UPDATE)
-			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE;
-
-		tcp_in_ack_event(sk, ack_ev_flags);
 	}
 
 	/* We passed data and got it acked, remove any soft error
@@ -3699,6 +3699,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 
 	tcp_rack_update_reo_wnd(sk, &rs);
 
+	tcp_in_ack_event(sk, flag);
+
 	if (tp->tlp_high_seq)
 		tcp_process_tlp_ack(sk, ack, flag);
 	/* If needed, reset TLP/RTO timer; RACK may later override this. */
@@ -3728,6 +3730,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 	return 1;
 
 no_queue:
+	tcp_in_ack_event(sk, flag);
 	/* If data was DSACKed, see if we can undo a cwnd reduction. */
 	if (flag & FLAG_DSACKING_ACK) {
 		tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, prior_snd_una, num_dupack, &flag,
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-18  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-18  9:43 [RFC PATCH 00/28]: Accurate ECN for TCP Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 01/28] tcp: add tp to prepare for AccECN code Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 02/28] tcp: fast path functions later Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 04/28] tcp: create FLAG_TS_PROGRESS Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 05/28] tcp: extend TCP flags to allow AE bit/ACE field Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 06/28] tcp: reorganize SYN ECN code Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 07/28] tcp: rework {__,}tcp_ecn_check_ce() -> tcp_data_ecn_check() Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 08/28] tcp: helpers for ECN mode handling Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 09/28] gso: AccECN support Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-19  3:44   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-03-19 22:36     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 10/28] gro: prevent ACE field corruption & better AccECN handling Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 11/28] tcp: AccECN support to tcp_add_backlog Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 12/28] tcp: AccECN core Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 13/28] tcp: Pass flags to tcp_send_ack Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 14/28] tcp: AccECN negotiation Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 15/28] tcp: add AccECN rx byte counters Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-19  3:36   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 16/28] tcp: allow embedding leftover into option padding Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 17/28] tcp: AccECN needs to know delivered bytes Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 18/28] tcp: don't early return when sack doesn't fit Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 19/28] tcp: AccECN option Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 20/28] tcp: AccECN option send control Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 21/28] tcp: AccECN option beacon Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 22/28] tcp: AccECN option order bit & failure handling Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 23/28] tcp: AccECN option ceb/cep heuristic Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 24/28] tcp: try to fit AccECN option with SACK Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-19  3:29   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-03-19 20:33     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 25/28] tcp: try to avoid safer when ACKs are thinned Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 26/28] tcp: to prevent runaway AccECN cep/ACE deficit, limit GSO size Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 27/28] gro: flushing when CWR is set negatively affects AccECN Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 28/28] tcp: AccECN sysctl documentation Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-19 23:02   ` Dave Taht
2020-03-20 22:40     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-20 23:22       ` Yuchung Cheng
2020-03-23 13:34         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-23 19:03           ` Yuchung Cheng
2020-03-24 12:50             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-24 17:05               ` Yuchung Cheng
2020-03-18 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28]: Accurate ECN for TCP David Miller
2020-03-19 20:25   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-20  4:38     ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-18  9:37 [RFC PATCH 02/28] tcp: fast path functions later Ilpo Järvinen
2020-03-18  9:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/28] tcp: move tcp_in_ack_event later Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1584524612-24470-4-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).