netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next] virtio-net: support XDP when not more queues
Date: Mon,  1 Mar 2021 11:22:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1614568959-107464-1-git-send-email-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for
XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT, then xdp cannot be loaded to work, even xdp does
not use the XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT.

This patch allows XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT to run by reuse the existing SQ
with __netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v5: change subject from 'support XDP_TX when not more queues'

v4: make sparse happy
    suggested by Jakub Kicinski

v3: add warning when no more queues
    suggested by Jesper Dangaard Brouer

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ba8e637..55f1dd1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
 	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;

+	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
+	bool xdp_enabled;
+
 	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
 	bool big_packets;

@@ -481,14 +484,42 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
 	return 0;
 }

-static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+	__acquires(lock)
 {
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
 	unsigned int qp;

-	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
+
+		/* tell sparse we took the lock, but don't really take it */
+		__acquire(lock);
+	} else {
+		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
+
 	return &vi->sq[qp];
 }

+static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq)
+	__releases(lock)
+{
+	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+	unsigned int qp;
+
+	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		qp = sq - vi->sq;
+		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
+		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+	} else {
+		/* make sparse happy */
+		__release(lock);
+	}
+}
+
 static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
 {
@@ -512,7 +543,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!xdp_prog)
 		return -ENXIO;

-	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);

 	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -560,12 +591,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
 	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
 	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);

+	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi, sq);
 	return ret;
 }

 static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
 {
-	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
+	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
 }

 /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
@@ -1457,12 +1489,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 		xdp_do_flush();

 	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
-		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
+		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
 		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
 			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
 			sq->stats.kicks++;
 			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
 		}
+		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi, sq);
 	}

 	return received;
@@ -2417,10 +2450,9 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,

 	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
 	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
-		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
+		netdev_warn(dev, "XDP request %i queues but max is %i. XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT will operate in a slower locked tx mode.\n",
 			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		xdp_qp = 0;
 	}

 	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
@@ -2454,11 +2486,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;

 	if (prog) {
+		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
 		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
 			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
 			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
 				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
 		}
+	} else {
+		vi->xdp_enabled = false;
 	}

 	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
@@ -2526,7 +2561,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
 	int err;

 	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
-		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
+		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
 			return -EBUSY;

 		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
--
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01  3:22 Xuan Zhuo [this message]
2021-03-05  7:08 ` [PATCH v5 net-next] virtio-net: support XDP when not more queues Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1614568959-107464-1-git-send-email-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).