From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out199-13.us.a.mail.aliyun.com (out199-13.us.a.mail.aliyun.com [47.90.199.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8033381AA; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=47.90.199.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710922351; cv=none; b=UxYGRFthWnlEK1BfDPjM4HHl/lo7YtbmXsRhTknEPTmC4Rbr1xn3aotXggUwUDg5FWuMyJB9sNqiYKPsYxZwUKDjp4rGaH0cwiVPdzVZf840RM66OQvbGG9BexEX/gzDkuoRMN9AT02dhkm8tyac2rm6ZDU0Ty6SKl1ml7QLFq4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710922351; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2Oq8Uun0tT2JiU0cIwoDYug7ugm+rPl/BjiEmuLGDr0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:Date:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=JIx8mDh+tkRNnCA/7OQqtLjoVvyb71rQMsHHRFbkyGFvmrkLwJfYuJUr6HSaQpwU/sOsCuDGT8+2BQRQBXeWFukqalmFmuQq7aLE5jwibpHE6XHqIG6fqGmXaIdTxOhtz+1KqB9RXQtWkWrtoeKZUlPHvyiv6B/uxvICHEyF9R4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=xMent+6C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=47.90.199.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="xMent+6C" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1710922330; h=Message-ID:Subject:Date:From:To; bh=2Oq8Uun0tT2JiU0cIwoDYug7ugm+rPl/BjiEmuLGDr0=; b=xMent+6Cd0amDN0wtKwklPgyJhlNIoFx6MSRQON91LDq2g5OKr6deJxXA3vidOjc633ypmu/UbSwIZ4RfKOPROmhzvCf6fyePC5hxGvKlK8GN0RRFhb/AUVvSUpDYouo1EE+vzwo75XY9m69LQNr58caAIV4QFOT7Oh4bXl4rVo= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046049;MF=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=19;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W2wfq-K_1710922327; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W2wfq-K_1710922327) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:12:08 +0800 Message-ID: <1710921861.9268863-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:04:21 +0800 From: Xuan Zhuo To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Amritha Nambiar , Larysa Zaremba , Sridhar Samudrala , Maciej Fijalkowski , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko References: <20240318110602.37166-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <1710762818.1520293-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <316ea06417279a45d2d54bf4cc4afd2d775b419a.camel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <316ea06417279a45d2d54bf4cc4afd2d775b419a.camel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:12:23 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 13:19 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:53:38PM CET, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:52:18 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:53PM CET, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com wrote: > > > > > As the spec: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/42f389989823039724f95bbbd243291ab0064f82 > > > > > > > > > > The virtio net supports to get device stats. > > > > > > > > > > Please review. > > > > > > > > net-next is closed. Please resubmit next week. > > > > > > > > > For review. > > > > RFC, or wait. > > @Xuan, please note that you received exactly the same feedback on your > previous submission, a few days ago. While I do understand the legit > interest in reviews, ignoring explicit feedback tend to bring no > feedback at all. Sorry. I have a question regarding the workflow for feature discussions. If we consistently engage in discussions about a particular feature, this may result in the submission of multiple patch sets. In light of this, should we modify the usage of "PATCH" or "RFC" in our submissions depending on whether the merge window is open or closed? This causes the title of our patch sets to keep changing. Or I miss something. Thanks. > > Paolo >