netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Peter Ceiley <peter@ceiley.net>
Cc: Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 Driver - Poor Network Performance Since Kernel 4.19
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:44:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <172787aa-9ef5-091d-f70f-baf89fe0b1ee@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMLO_R5ksPHdAm-q-t3XB_AKyHTGNf76wZNLSHeOR5iYQTzoHg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Peter,

I think the vendor driver doesn't enable ASPM per default.
So it's worth a try to disable ASPM in the BIOS or via sysfs.
Few older systems seem to have issues with ASPM, what kind of
system / mainboard are you using? The RTL8168 is the onboard
network chip?

Rgds, Heiner


On 29.01.2019 07:20, Peter Ceiley wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
> 
> Thanks, I'll do some more testing. It might not be the driver - I
> assumed it was due to the fact that using the r8168 driver 'resolves'
> the issue. I'll see if I can test the r8169.c on top of 4.19 - this is
> a good idea.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Peter.
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 17:16, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> at a first glance it doesn't look like a typical driver issue.
>> What you could do:
>>
>> - Test the r8169.c from 4.18 on top of 4.19.
>>
>> - Check whether disabling ASPM (/sys/module/pcie_aspm) has an effect.
>>
>> - Bisect between 4.18 and 4.19 to find the offending commit.
>>
>> Any specific reason why you think root cause is in the driver and not
>> elsewhere in the network subsystem?
>>
>> Heiner
>>
>>
>> On 28.01.2019 23:10, Peter Ceiley wrote:
>>> Hi Heiner,
>>>
>>> Thanks for getting back to me.
>>>
>>> No, I don't use jumbo packets.
>>>
>>> Bandwidth is *generally* good, and iperf results to my NAS provide
>>> over 900 Mbits/s in both circumstances. The issue seems to appear when
>>> establishing a connection and is most notable, for example, on my
>>> mounted NFS shares where it takes seconds (up to 10's of seconds on
>>> larger directories) to list the contents of each directory. Once a
>>> transfer begins on a file, I appear to get good bandwidth.
>>>
>>> I'm unsure of the best scientific data to provide you in order to
>>> troubleshoot this issue. Running the following
>>>
>>>     netstat -s |grep retransmitted
>>>
>>> shows a steady increase in retransmitted segments each time I list the
>>> contents of a remote directory, for example, running 'ls' on a
>>> directory containing 345 media files did the following using kernel
>>> 4.19.18:
>>>
>>> increased retransmitted segments by 21 and the 'time' command showed
>>> the following:
>>>     real    0m19.867s
>>>     user    0m0.012s
>>>     sys    0m0.036s
>>>
>>> The same command shows no retransmitted segments running kernel
>>> 4.18.16 and 'time' showed:
>>>     real    0m0.300s
>>>     user    0m0.004s
>>>     sys    0m0.007s
>>>
>>> ifconfig does not show any RX/TX errors nor dropped packets in either case.
>>>
>>> dmesg XID:
>>> [    2.979984] r8169 0000:03:00.0 eth0: RTL8168g/8111g,
>>> f8:b1:56:fe:67:e0, XID 4c000800, IRQ 32
>>>
>>> # lspci -vv
>>> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
>>> RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0c)
>>>     Subsystem: Dell RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
>>>     Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
>>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
>>>     Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>>>     Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
>>>     Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
>>>     Region 0: I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
>>>     Region 2: Memory at f7b00000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
>>>     Region 4: Memory at f2100000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>>     Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>>>         Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA
>>> PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
>>>         Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>>>     Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>>>         Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
>>>     Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
>>>         DevCap:    MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
>>> <512ns, L1 <64us
>>>             ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-
>>> SlotPowerLimit 10.000W
>>>         DevCtl:    CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq-
>>>             RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
>>>             MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
>>>         DevSta:    CorrErr+ NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
>>>         LnkCap:    Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Exit
>>> Latency L0s unlimited, L1 <64us
>>>             ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
>>>         LnkCtl:    ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+
>>>             ExtSynch- ClockPM+ AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>>>         LnkSta:    Speed 2.5GT/s (ok), Width x1 (ok)
>>>             TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
>>>         DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR+,
>>> OBFF Via message/WAKE#
>>>              AtomicOpsCap: 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
>>>         DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR+,
>>> OBFF Disabled
>>>              AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn-
>>>         LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
>>>              Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range,
>>> EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
>>>              Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
>>>         LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB,
>>> EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
>>>              EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
>>>     Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=4 Masked-
>>>         Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
>>>         PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
>>>     Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
>>> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Input/output error
>>>         Not readable
>>>     Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>         UESta:    DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
>>> RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>>>         UEMsk:    DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
>>> RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>>>         UESvrt:    DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt-
>>> RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>>>         CESta:    RxErr+ BadTLP+ BadDLLP+ Rollover- Timeout+ AdvNonFatalErr-
>>>         CEMsk:    RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+
>>>         AERCap:    First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn-
>>> ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
>>>             MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
>>>         HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>     Capabilities: [140 v1] Virtual Channel
>>>         Caps:    LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
>>>         Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
>>>         Ctrl:    ArbSelect=Fixed
>>>         Status:    InProgress-
>>>         VC0:    Caps:    PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
>>>             Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
>>>             Ctrl:    Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=01
>>>             Status:    NegoPending- InProgress-
>>>     Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 01-00-00-00-68-4c-e0-00
>>>     Capabilities: [170 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>>>         Max snoop latency: 71680ns
>>>         Max no snoop latency: 71680ns
>>>     Kernel driver in use: r8169
>>>     Kernel modules: r8169
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you have any other ideas in terms of testing.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:28, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 28.01.2019 12:13, Peter Ceiley wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been experiencing very poor network performance since Kernel
>>>>> 4.19 and I'm confident it's related to the r8169 driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no issue with kernel versions 4.18 and prior. I am experiencing
>>>>> this issue in kernels 4.19 and 4.20 (currently running/testing with
>>>>> 4.20.4 & 4.19.18).
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone could guide me in the right direction, I'm happy to help
>>>>> troubleshoot this issue. Note that I have been keeping an eye on one
>>>>> issue related to loading of the PHY driver, however, my symptoms
>>>>> differ in that I still have a network connection. I have attempted to
>>>>> reload the driver on a running system, but this does not improve the
>>>>> situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Using the proprietary r8168 driver returns my device to proper working order.
>>>>>
>>>>> lshw shows:
>>>>>        description: Ethernet interface
>>>>>        product: RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
>>>>>        vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
>>>>>        physical id: 0
>>>>>        bus info: pci@0000:03:00.0
>>>>>        logical name: enp3s0
>>>>>        version: 0c
>>>>>        serial:
>>>>>        size: 1Gbit/s
>>>>>        capacity: 1Gbit/s
>>>>>        width: 64 bits
>>>>>        clock: 33MHz
>>>>>        capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix vpd bus_master cap_list
>>>>> ethernet physical tp aui bnc mii fibre 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd
>>>>> 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
>>>>>        configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169
>>>>> duplex=full firmware=rtl8168g-2_0.0.1 02/06/13 ip=192.168.1.25
>>>>> latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=MII speed=1Gbit/s
>>>>>        resources: irq:19 ioport:d000(size=256)
>>>>> memory:f7b00000-f7b00fff memory:f2100000-f2103fff
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>
>>>> the description "poor network performance" is quite vague, therefore:
>>>>
>>>> - Can you provide any measurements?
>>>> - iperf results before and after
>>>> - statistics about dropped packets (rx and/or tx)
>>>> - Do you use jumbo packets?
>>>>
>>>> Also help would be a "lspci -vv" output for the network card and
>>>> the dmesg output line with the chip XID.
>>>>
>>>> Heiner
>>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-28 11:13 r8169 Driver - Poor Network Performance Since Kernel 4.19 Peter Ceiley
2019-01-28 18:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-28 22:10   ` Peter Ceiley
2019-01-29  6:16     ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-29  6:20       ` Peter Ceiley
2019-01-29  6:44         ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2019-01-30  9:59           ` Peter Ceiley
2019-01-30 19:15             ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-31  2:32               ` David Chang
2019-01-31  6:21                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-31  6:35                   ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-31  6:49                     ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-01-31  7:23                     ` David Chang
2019-01-31 12:09                       ` Peter Ceiley
2019-01-31 18:28                         ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-01  4:27                           ` David Chang
2019-02-01  4:29                     ` David Chang
2019-02-01  6:32                       ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-02 12:25                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-05 18:50                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-05 18:53                   ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-11  6:23                   ` David Chang
2019-02-14  2:45                   ` David Chang
2019-02-14  6:17                     ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-02-15  2:51                       ` David Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=172787aa-9ef5-091d-f70f-baf89fe0b1ee@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=peter@ceiley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).