From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EAEC432C3 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB93E206BF for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EGplOT7r" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726618AbfK0LD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:03:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:20131 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726194AbfK0LD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:03:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1574852605; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k6afWhW0k+5vQvAI3+I3yvEiGsV/YiHUSVuZ0gqzLhc=; b=EGplOT7rY6CUKzV1Ejux6aZGpVi0gzrAGTsnfLEoAnLZ/pjM2AW4SzY0VL2upxmvyWmPbo lK9T3RBZkJ4bP9+v6KYieW6PhocEyDGm4RZCdDKA1nUbc030fn7/U4dDhUGH4JnkWME6eZ ng+FICi9dp5pvtb+hAOTc6oPPj8GvE8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-158-VMx6fb4AN96ge09SQCM90Q-1; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:03:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B6A2593A1; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.78] (ovpn-12-78.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.78]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217425D9D6; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [net-next v2 1/1] virtual-bus: Implementation of Virtual Bus From: Jason Wang To: Martin Habets , Parav Pandit , Jeff Kirsher , "davem@davemloft.net" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Cc: Dave Ertman , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "sassmann@redhat.com" , "jgg@ziepe.ca" , Kiran Patil , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alex Williamson , "Bie, Tiwei" References: <20191115223355.1277139-1-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <30b968cf-0e11-a2c6-5b9f-5518df11dfb7@solarflare.com> <22dd6ae3-03f4-1432-2935-8df5e9a449de@redhat.com> <0b845456-54b2-564a-0979-ba55bcf3269c@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1d9a5ee9-779e-6255-08c6-b4f57af701a6@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:03:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0b845456-54b2-564a-0979-ba55bcf3269c@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-MC-Unique: VMx6fb4AN96ge09SQCM90Q-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2019/11/27 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:58, Jason Wang wrote: > >> With the virtual bus we do have a solid foundation going forward, for=20 >> the users we know now and for >> future ones. > > > If I understand correctly, if multiplexer is not preferred. It would=20 > be hard to have a bus on your own code, there's no much code could be=20 > reused. > Sorry, I meant "not hard to have" ... Thanks > Thanks=20