netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netfilter/iptables] Add new slavedev match extension
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:00:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e3cec29b871a86cc508e05b59405b2feaf79545.camel@strongswan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116195939.5ordyhfwfspspafa@salvia>


> > So I guess there is some value in these patches for those users to
> > extend their filtering with VRF support.
> 
> A single xt_slavedev module only for this is too much overhead, if
> you find an existing extension (via revision infrastructure) where
> you can make this fit in, I would consider this.

The only feasible candidate I see is the physdev match. However, there
is not much in common code-wise. And from a user perspective, slavedev
matching via physdev and the interaction between these functionalities
just makes that confusing.

So for now I'll keep the slavedev match out-of-tree, then.

Thanks,
Martin


      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17 13:56 [PATCH netfilter/iptables] Add new slavedev match extension Martin Willi
2019-12-17 13:56 ` [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_slavedev: Add new L3master slave input device match Martin Willi
2019-12-17 13:56 ` [PATCH iptables] extensions: Add new xt_slavedev input interface match extension Martin Willi
2020-01-10 16:34 ` [PATCH netfilter/iptables] Add new slavedev " Martin Willi
2020-01-16 19:59   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-01-17 12:00     ` Martin Willi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e3cec29b871a86cc508e05b59405b2feaf79545.camel@strongswan.org \
    --to=martin@strongswan.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).