From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:49:11 +1100 Message-ID: <20100205224911.d6b089e5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100205165059.0b5d5363.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100204.223255.146893399.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__5_Feb_2010_22_49_11_+1100_KU75_Hlq_bBdonsn" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicholasx.d.nunley@intel.com To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100204.223255.146893399.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__5_Feb_2010_22_49_11_+1100_KU75_Hlq_bBdonsn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:32:55 -0800 (PST) David Miller = wrote: > > Damn namespace pollution, this is one of a zillion reasons > I prefer drivers are written in one sorce file, then people > can name their functions however they like and they're all > marked static so it doesn't cause problems like this. >=20 > I've fixed it up as follows in net-next-2.6 Looks good, thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__5_Feb_2010_22_49_11_+1100_KU75_Hlq_bBdonsn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktsBbcACgkQjjKRsyhoI8yI6ACdEU60Y5WDizRAvjbVKhHGw6Vv gCcAnRephHf7qNNaGiLGakB2s2KGKRTu =qRnG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__5_Feb_2010_22_49_11_+1100_KU75_Hlq_bBdonsn--