From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Holt Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding. Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:30:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com> References: <1312993670-23999-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <1312993670-23999-6-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <4E42B83C.2040705@freescale.com> <20110810171933.GW4926@sgi.com> <4E42C196.7030708@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, U Bhaskar-B22300 , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Marc Kleine-Budde , PPC list , Wolfgang Grandegger To: Scott Wood Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E42C196.7030708-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote: > >>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock > >>> - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to > >>> - the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock > >>> - (driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock > >>> - is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock). > >>> - The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that > >>> - generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the > >>> - time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform. > >>> +- compatible : Should be "fsl,flexcan" and optionally > >>> + "fsl,flexcan-" > >> > >> fsl,-flexcan, and it should not be optional, and should come > >> before "fsl,flexcan". > >> > >> Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for > >> anything which is backwards compatible with p1010's implementation. > > > > How do I specify 'canonical compatible'? > > Something like: > > compatible: Should be "fsl,-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan". > > An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles > that it is fully backwards compatible with: > > - fsl,p1010-rdb I am so confused. fsl,p1010-flexcan refers, in my mind at least, to a particular chiplet on the p1010 freescale processor. fsl,p1010-rdb would mean nothing to me as that is a p1010 processor with two flexcan chiplets wired to a pair of DB-9 jacks. For the driver, what additional information is being conveyed? Let's cut to the chase. Here is what I have after incorporating your earlier comment about the compatible line. Please mark this up to exactly what you are asking for. Thanks, Robin ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flexcan CAN contoller on Freescale's ARM and PowerPC processors Required properties: - compatible : Should be "fsl,-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan" - reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device - interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device Example: can@1c000 { compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan"; reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>; interrupts = <48 0x2>; interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; };