From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:07:44 +1000 Message-ID: <20110812120744.1912ca01ab4e76faaa93892c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__12_Aug_2011_12_07_44_+1000_tfZtuX=5cQYvbMF5" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__12_Aug_2011_12_07_44_+1000_tfZtuX=5cQYvbMF5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jeff, In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC. Won't that mean that all the PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no longer build this driver? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__12_Aug_2011_12_07_44_+1000_tfZtuX=5cQYvbMF5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJORIrwAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsvA8H/0flvKjFD2UX1SIeWH/PHvrN 2ocpM3EzMiMuBAaEcACvzudQw0NMpem8XfcMTEMux/K4msp6YTLDjTwiNaP7oQvw 3n81QsHuqzp7Gfg+YuD/0Ru3/M1rQKFe2CFrTL6iumlUU8LstsIp4B/n/5glIF9W sHQEVmsL8sjYkxgDNU+FmWfMte4pajE+i20dm32MzvjGCX7Ze3b57sejUMI6nC6w Xx8ZQr1EZFPwZFNxgbwB589o94vAz8nHyg+g5AznLL6peaZQYhXwFZ0XBWuw5OyO t8VUtV8xE/7a853u6ExYRgAwZTkl0XnG8oUQND7He2OCcJ1aIo3bqz74zp+whpo= =Wprq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__12_Aug_2011_12_07_44_+1000_tfZtuX=5cQYvbMF5--