From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Bridge stays down until a port is added Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:57:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20110822085730.69d56034@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> References: <20110811070659.GA21307@torres.zugschlus.de> <20110811081706.7307e8b2@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> <20110811205429.GB21307@torres.zugschlus.de> <20110820094712.GC21307@torres.zugschlus.de> <20110820093059.75c37a1f@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net> <20110821121305.GA22232@torres.zugschlus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Sven-Haegar Koch To: Marc Haber Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:40412 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294Ab1HVP5T (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:57:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110821121305.GA22232@torres.zugschlus.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:13:05 +0200 Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:30:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The problem is that IPv6 Duplicate Address Detection needs to > > work. This is not a simple problem. If the bridge asserted > > carrier with no ports then: > > > > 1. IPv6 address assigned and IPv6 decides it is okay. > > 2. Port added later > > 3. Another system has the same address. > > *broke* > > Same situation when a system-to-system-link is added after bringing up > an interface. I agree that the issue is not an issue if a real switch > is being used. > > > If you want to avoid DAD, then you can configure disable DAD > > by setting /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/br0/accept_dad to 0 > > I'd like to avoid that. > > 2001:db8::1 > > Would it acceptable (and clean!) to have: > > eth0: 2001:db8:1::100/64 default gw to the internet is 2001:db8:1::1 > lo: 127.0.0.1/8, ::1/128, 2001:db8:2::100/64 > br0: 2001:db8:2::1/64 (being default gw for the VMs connected to br0, > routing 2001:db8:2::/64 to the Internet) > > Note 2001:db8:2::/64 being used both on lo and br0, with 2001:db8:2::100 meant > to be reachable from the Internet even if no VM is already up. my > hostname will be A-Recorded to 2001:db8:2::100 with proper reverse > DNS. The background for doing so is that I cannot control the reverse > DNS for the IP addresses inside 200a:db8:1::/64 in a lot of my setups > (for example, if my IPv6 comes in via Sixxs). > No, DAD config is per interface and addrconf doesn't know anything about your topology.