From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> References: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, davem@davemloft.net To: Jason Wang Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts > involved in the multi queue implementation: > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result > could be seen in this page > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would > post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread. Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest? -- MST