From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 01:27:36 -0700
Message-ID: <20110918082736.GB19444@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1313085588.git.jbaron@redhat.com>
 <5514795fe63ccfd4b3a80283ed04a526abe3c59d.1313085588.git.jbaron@redhat.com>
 <201109011657.02407.arnd@arndb.de>
 <20110901151817.GA14324@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, gregkh@suse.de, joe@perches.com,
	jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110901151817.GA14324@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need
> > __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the
> > same Kconfig symbol.
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, I've posted a fix for this:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297
> 
> Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon.

As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the
end result?

thanks,

greg k-h