From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Baron Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:48:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20110919134814.GA2658@redhat.com> References: <5514795fe63ccfd4b3a80283ed04a526abe3c59d.1313085588.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <201109011657.02407.arnd@arndb.de> <20110901151817.GA14324@redhat.com> <20110918082736.GB19444@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arnd Bergmann , gregkh@suse.de, joe@perches.com, jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net To: Greg KH Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110918082736.GB19444@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:27:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need > > > __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the > > > same Kconfig symbol. > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Yes, I've posted a fix for this: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297 > > > > Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon. > > As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the > end result? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi, Andrew Morton has pulled these into his -mm tree...so I think the series should be all set. Thanks, -Jason