From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded encapsulation Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:21:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20121026132104.028a149f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1351189753-5912-1-git-send-email-joseph.gasparakis@intel.com> <1351189753-5912-2-git-send-email-joseph.gasparakis@intel.com> <20121025141656.5383dabe@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1351203635.2662.73.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Hutchings , "davem@davemloft.net" , "chrisw@sous-sol.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" To: "Gasparakis, Joseph" Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:40286 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966367Ab2JZUV6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:21:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:54:12 +0000 "Gasparakis, Joseph" wrote: > Stephen, are you happy with Ben's comment? > If that is the case I would prefer to keep the patch as is as I believe it makes sense to group the features that way. No problem. As long as it's safe which Ben said.