From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PULL] vhost: cleanups and fixes for 3.10 Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:05:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20130501.150548.1959140741961524114.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130501150130.GA21230@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agrover@redhat.com, asias@redhat.com, brian@purestorage.com, hch@lst.de, joern@logfs.org, mark.d.rustad@intel.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, nab@linux-iscsi.org, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn To: mst@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:41729 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756120Ab3EATFw (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 15:05:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130501150130.GA21230@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 18:01:31 +0300 > Please pull the following vhost core updates for 3.10 - > they affect both vhost-net and vhost-scsi devices. > They also *depend* on both net-next and target-pending. Since Linus > merged target-pending but not net-next at this point, merging through > the net tree seems to make sense. I don't have target-pending in my tree though and I'm not going to pull it in just for this. Since you have such a multi-dependency situation, just ask Linus to pull this directly after I push net-next to him, which should be later today. Thanks.