netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: esp{4,6}: fix potential MTU calculation overflows
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:38:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130805143833.GA27692@d2.synalogic.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375699775-13769-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>

On 2013/08/05 12:49, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Commit 91657eafb ("xfrm: take net hdr len into account for esp payload
> size calculation") introduced a possible interger overflow in
> esp{4,6}_get_mtu() handlers in case of x->props.mode equals
> XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL. Thus, the following expression will overflow
> 
>   unsigned int net_adj;
>   ...
>   <case ipv{4,6} XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL>
>          net_adj = 0;
>   ...
>   return ((mtu - x->props.header_len - crypto_aead_authsize(esp->aead) -
>            net_adj) & ~(align - 1)) + (net_adj - 2);
> 
> where (net_adj - 2) would be evaluated as <foo> + (0 - 2) in an unsigned
> context. Fix it by simply removing brackets as those operations here

I can see this creating problems if there was comparison or type
promotion, but I don't see an integer overflow.

In any case, it is right to remove the parentheses. They are dubious
style at the expense of correctness. They have no effect in this case.

Acked-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>

> do not need to have special precedence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
> ---
>  Note: only compile tested, maybe Benjamin can comment on why he added
>        brackets around this expression. *If* this is valid (which I do
>        not think), then this needs at least a big comment explaining so.
> 
>  net/ipv4/esp4.c | 2 +-
>  net/ipv6/esp6.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
> index ab3d814..109ee89 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
> @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static u32 esp4_get_mtu(struct xfrm_state *x, int mtu)
>  	}
>  
>  	return ((mtu - x->props.header_len - crypto_aead_authsize(esp->aead) -
> -		 net_adj) & ~(align - 1)) + (net_adj - 2);
> +		 net_adj) & ~(align - 1)) + net_adj - 2;
>  }
>  
>  static void esp4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6.c b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
> index 40ffd72..aeac0dc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/esp6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static u32 esp6_get_mtu(struct xfrm_state *x, int mtu)
>  		net_adj = 0;
>  
>  	return ((mtu - x->props.header_len - crypto_aead_authsize(esp->aead) -
> -		 net_adj) & ~(align - 1)) + (net_adj - 2);
> +		 net_adj) & ~(align - 1)) + net_adj - 2;
>  }
>  
>  static void esp6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05 10:49 [PATCH net] net: esp{4,6}: fix potential MTU calculation overflows Daniel Borkmann
2013-08-05 14:38 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2013-08-05 19:27 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130805143833.GA27692@d2.synalogic.ca \
    --to=bpoirier@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).