From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 net] xen-netback: transition to CLOSED when removing a VIF Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20131007134314.GD28411@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <1381150519-14557-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , , Ian Campbell , Wei Liu , Paul Durrant To: David Vrabel Return-path: Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:18368 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753401Ab3JGNsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:48:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381150519-14557-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:55:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > From: David Vrabel > > If a guest is destroyed without transitioning its frontend to CLOSED, > the domain becomes a zombie as netback was not grant unmapping the > shared rings. > > When removing a VIF, transition the backend to CLOSED so the VIF is > disconnected if necessary (which will unmap the shared rings etc). > > This fixes a regression introduced by > 279f438e36c0a70b23b86d2090aeec50155034a9 (xen-netback: Don't destroy > the netdev until the vif is shut down). > Is this regression solely caused by 279f438e36c or caused by both ea732dff5c and 279f438e36c? I ask because you make use of the new state machine introduced in ea732dff5c. Or are you simply using the new state machine to fix the regression instead of going back to old code? Wei. > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel > Cc: Ian Campbell > Cc: Wei Liu > Cc: Paul Durrant > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > index b45bce2..1b08d87 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -39,11 +39,15 @@ static int connect_rings(struct backend_info *); > static void connect(struct backend_info *); > static void backend_create_xenvif(struct backend_info *be); > static void unregister_hotplug_status_watch(struct backend_info *be); > +static void set_backend_state(struct backend_info *be, > + enum xenbus_state state); > > static int netback_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev) > { > struct backend_info *be = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev); > > + set_backend_state(be, XenbusStateClosed); > + > unregister_hotplug_status_watch(be); > if (be->vif) { > kobject_uevent(&dev->dev.kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE); > -- > 1.7.2.5