From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: Linux kernel patch: elide fib_validate_source() completely when possible - bad side effect? Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 03:06:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20140123020642.GH7269@order.stressinduktion.org> References: <52D945400200005D00047758@gwia2.atlnz.lc> <52DCF1440200005D000477FD@gwia2.atlnz.lc> <20140123020224.GG7269@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: Julian Anastasov , gregory hoggarth , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:59366 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752734AbaAWCGo (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:06:44 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140123020224.GG7269@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:02:24AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:04:52PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > I don't remember someone mentioning about such > > side-effect, I guess it is overlooked. IMHO, it is not a good > > reason to restore the old behavior. Lets see other opinions. > > A routing lookup to check for broadcast is much too expansive, I agree. But > can't we just check skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST? Ah, sorry, other way around, we need to check the source address. Maybe a small hash table to look for currently installed broadcast addresses? Greetings, Hannes