From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] tcp: tcp_info extensions Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:08:55 -0300 Message-ID: <20150512130855.GA29412@localhost.localdomain> References: <1430260098-14127-1-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev , Eric Dumazet , Yuchung Cheng , Matt Mathis , Eric Salo , Martin Lau , Chris Rapier To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42695 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932339AbbELNJA (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 09:09:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1430260098-14127-1-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:28:16PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > As discussed during Chris Rapier presentation in Ottawa / netdev0.1, > we add to tcp_info the first two fields are highly wanted. > > Each field is added into a single patch for easy code review. > > (Corresponding iproute2/ss patches will be sent) > > Next fields will follow once consensus is reached. Is tcpEStatsPerfSegsOut amongst them? I have a need for this one and can submit a patch if you're not tracking it already. Marcelo