From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] dp83640: Delay scheduled work. Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:59:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20151102095947.GA3291@netboy> References: <1446207244-2206-1-git-send-email-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com> <1446207244-2206-3-git-send-email-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com> <20151030203729.GC27879@netboy> <1446448990.2437.7.camel@spectralink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?U/hyZW5zZW4s?= Stefan Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:37000 "EHLO mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751310AbbKBJ7w (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 04:59:52 -0500 Received: by wmff134 with SMTP id f134so55548372wmf.0 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:59:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1446448990.2437.7.camel@spectralink.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:23:12AM +0000, S=F8rensen, Stefan wrote: > The workqueue is only used for delivering packets where the timestamp > was lost - if a timestamp is received, the packet is delivered > immediately. This patch may introduce a slight delay of the packets > where the timestamp never arrives, by these packets are properly not > very useful to the application anyway. Ok, thanks for the explanation. I mixed this up with another out of tree driver that I was hacking recently. Acked-by: Richard Cochran