From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] i40e: Look up MAC address in Open Firmware or IDPROM Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:26:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20151104192614.GC14575@oracle.com> References: <20151030183645.GD32759@oracle.com> <20151030192437.GE32759@oracle.com> <20151030231301.GA14974@oracle.com> <20151101162407.GA26373@oracle.com> <20151102000701.GD9552@oracle.com> <20151102195707.GC15009@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" To: "Nelson, Shannon" Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:38048 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756412AbbKDT0S (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:26:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151102195707.GC15009@oracle.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (11/02/15 14:57), Sowmini Varadhan wrote: > On (11/02/15 17:26), Nelson, Shannon wrote: > > > I assume you mean .1q > > > > Yes, this is what I had in mind. > > I dont think we're quite there yet, even without vlans. > Ok finally got all the .1q stuff verified (took a bit longer than it should, because of some lab/administrative hassles in getting the vlans adjusted at intermediate switches). But the fix as I'd sent has been tested, and it is good for .1q. The issues I was seeing with promisc were orthogonal to my fix, or even to my platform - I understand those are being addressed separately. I'm probably too late for the merge window, and I dont know if this fix qualifies as "critical" for net, so I'll re-target v5 for net-next, to be conservative. --Sowmini