netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/15] nfp: correct RX buffer length calculation
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:39:17 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160405.113917.846241936652070162.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459544811-24879-2-git-send-email-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Fri,  1 Apr 2016 22:06:37 +0100

> When calculating the RX buffer length we need to account for
> up to 2 VLAN tags and up to 8 MPLS labels.  Rounding up to 1k
> is an relic of a distant past and can be removed.  While at
> it also remove trivial print statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

I disagree with the MPLS aspect of this change.

VLAN is special, in that when the hardware supports VLAN properly, the
VLAN header doesn't eat into the MTU and is sort of "transparent".

But MPLS doesn't work that way.

MPLS is in the main frame and takes up MTU space.

Therefore I see no reason to increase the buffer length by 8 * MPLS
which is just a rediculous amount of wasted space.

I'm not applying this without at least some more explanations about
why exactly you need to account for these values in the commit message.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-05 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01 21:06 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/15] MTU/buffer reconfig changes Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/15] nfp: correct RX buffer length calculation Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-05 15:39   ` David Miller [this message]
2016-04-05 17:24     ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/15] nfp: move link state interrupt request/free calls Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/15] nfp: break up nfp_net_{alloc|free}_rings Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/15] nfp: make *x_ring_init do all the init Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/15] nfp: allocate ring SW structs dynamically Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/15] nfp: cleanup tx ring flush and rename to reset Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/15] nfp: reorganize initial filling of RX rings Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/15] nfp: preallocate RX buffers early in .ndo_open Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/15] nfp: move filling ring information to FW config Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/15] nfp: slice .ndo_open() and .ndo_stop() up Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/15] nfp: sync ring state during FW reconfiguration Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/15] nfp: propagate list buffer size in struct rx_ring Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/15] nfp: convert .ndo_change_mtu() to prepare/commit paradigm Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 14/15] nfp: pass ring count as function parameter Jakub Kicinski
2016-04-01 21:06 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 15/15] nfp: allow ring size reconfiguration at runtime Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160405.113917.846241936652070162.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).