netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth.h: __ variants of u8 and friends are not neccessary inside kernel
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:38:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161006083804.GA2993@x1c.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475737676.3224.1.camel@perches.com>

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I believe you are wrong. bit addressability does not matter, cpu can
> > definitely get the bit values.
> > 
> > u8 foo:1;
> > u8 bar:1;
> > u8 baz:1;
> > 
> > should take 1 byte, where
> > 
> > bool foo, bar, baz;
> > 
> > will take more like 3.
> 
> Definitely true.
> 
> There is only one single bitfield foo here though
> so what you wrote doesn't apply.

What's in the tree is a left-over from times when there were multiple
bit fields in this struct. By the time others were removed and there was
only one left no-one has apparently bothered to update it to a bool or
single u8.

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-06  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-03  8:56 [PATCH] bluetooth.h: __ variants of u8 and friends are not neccessary inside kernel Pavel Machek
2016-10-05 11:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-10-05 17:53   ` Joe Perches
     [not found]     ` <1475689996.6105.11.camel-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-05 19:11       ` Pavel Machek
2016-10-05 19:15         ` Joe Perches
2016-10-05 22:13           ` Pavel Machek
2016-10-05 22:28             ` Joe Perches
2016-10-06  7:02               ` Pavel Machek
2016-10-06  7:07                 ` Joe Perches
2016-10-06  8:38                   ` Johan Hedberg [this message]
2016-10-06  9:41           ` David Laight
2016-10-06 11:38             ` Joe Perches
2016-10-06 13:00               ` David Laight
2016-10-06 15:41                 ` Joe Perches
2016-10-05 20:51 ` [PATCHv2] " Pavel Machek
2016-10-05 21:54   ` Marcel Holtmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161006083804.GA2993@x1c.lan \
    --to=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).