From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements.
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20170314.172937.1289357366273291363.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
        james.hogan@imgtec.com, ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steven.hill@cavium.com
To: david.daney@cavium.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700

> Changes from v1:
> 
>   - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
> 
>   - Added three more patches for other problems found.
> 
> 
> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
> identified some failures and unimplemented features.
> 
> With this patch set we get:
> 
>      test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed]
> 
> Both big and little endian tested.
> 
> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing.

What tree are you targetting with these changes?  Do you expect
them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree?

Please be explicit about this in the future.

Thank you.