From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-resend 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:14:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107111431.0d812b77@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d056477c-b322-6212-6d1e-1369c019d5c2@secunet.com>
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:13:22 +0100
Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com> wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> the following set of three patches tries deals with socket policies.
> The first patch adresses the missing filter option for socket
> polices. Especially when dealing with many of those, it is quite
> cumbersome to filter them from the iproute2-output. So an option
> to remove them from the output has been added.
> Also when trying to deleteall policies iproute2 tries to delete
> socket based policies, too. The result is an error message which
> is misleading and unnecessary. So the second patch skips all
> socket policies when deleteall-ing policies.
> The third patch allow to deleteall policies and states even if
> they have a mark. I'm not sure if the current behavior is
> intended but if iproute2 finds a policy or state with a mark
> it tries to delete the corresponding policy/state *without*
> a mark. Also the result is an error and the policy/state is
> not deleted.
> Resend with modifications as requested by Stephen.
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
> Thomas Egerer (3):
> xfrm_policy: Add filter option for socket policies
> xfrm_policy: Do not attempt to deleteall a socket policy
> xfrm_{state,policy}: Allow to deleteall polices/states with marks
>
> ip/xfrm.h | 1 +
> ip/xfrm_policy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> ip/xfrm_state.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-30 18:11 [PATCH iproute2 3/3] xfrm_{state,policy}: Allow to deleteall polices/states with marks Thomas Egerer
2017-10-31 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-01 9:52 ` Thomas Egerer
2017-11-01 21:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-02 13:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-resend 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Thomas Egerer
2017-11-07 2:14 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-11-02 13:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-resend 1/3] xfrm_policy: Add filter option for socket policies Thomas Egerer
2017-11-02 13:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-resend 2/3] xfrm_policy: Do not attempt to deleteall a socket policy Thomas Egerer
2017-11-02 13:13 ` [PATCH iproute2-resend 3/3] xfrm_{state,policy}: Allow to deleteall polices/states with marks Thomas Egerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171107111431.0d812b77@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.egerer@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).