From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] tools: bpftool: add delimiters to multi-function JITed dumps Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:55:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20180522125544.541c68c8@cakuba> References: <88b61b11ebca5b44bad0c34225b6f2383e5983a5.1527008647.git.sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Quentin Monnet To: Sandipan Das Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f196.google.com ([209.85.220.196]:33908 "EHLO mail-qk0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752161AbeEVTzs (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 15:55:48 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f196.google.com with SMTP id p186-v6so15626207qkd.1 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:55:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88b61b11ebca5b44bad0c34225b6f2383e5983a5.1527008647.git.sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 22 May 2018 22:46:13 +0530, Sandipan Das wrote: > + if (info.nr_jited_func_lens && info.jited_func_lens) { > + struct kernel_sym *sym = NULL; > + unsigned char *img = buf; > + __u64 *ksyms = NULL; > + __u32 *lens; > + __u32 i; > + > + if (info.nr_jited_ksyms) { > + kernel_syms_load(&dd); > + ksyms = (__u64 *) info.jited_ksyms; > + } > + > + lens = (__u32 *) info.jited_func_lens; > + for (i = 0; i < info.nr_jited_func_lens; i++) { > + if (ksyms) { > + sym = kernel_syms_search(&dd, ksyms[i]); > + if (sym) > + printf("%s:\n", sym->name); > + else > + printf("%016llx:\n", ksyms[i]); > + } > + > + disasm_print_insn(img, lens[i], opcodes, name); > + img += lens[i]; > + printf("\n"); > + } > + } else { The output doesn't seem to be JSON-compatible :( We try to make sure all bpftool command can produce valid JSON when run with -j (or -p) switch. Would it be possible to make each function a separate JSON object with "name" and "insn" array? Would that work?