From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/31] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 01:49:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20180523004904.GH30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180522113108.25713-1-hch@lst.de> <20180522113108.25713-9-hch@lst.de> <20180522220524.GE30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180523004530.GG30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180523004530.GG30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 01:45:30AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Oh, bugger... > > wakeup > removed from queue > schedule __aio_poll_complete() > > cancel > grab ctx->lock > remove from list > work > aio_complete() > check if it's in the list > it isn't, move on to free the sucker > cancel > call ->ki_cancel() > BOOM > > Looks like we want to call ->ki_cancel() *BEFORE* removing from the list, > as well as doing fput() after aio_complete(). The same ordering, BTW, goes > for aio_read() et.al. > > Look: > CPU1: io_cancel() grabs ->ctx_lock, finds iocb and removes it from the list. > CPU2: aio_rw_complete() on that iocb. Since the sucker is not in the list > anymore, we do NOT spin on ->ctx_lock and proceed to free iocb > CPU1: pass freed iocb to ->ki_cancel(). BOOM. BTW, it seems that the mainline is vulnerable to this one. I might be missing something, but... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org