From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC CPSW switchdev mode
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:59 +0200
Message-ID: <20180524152559.GF5128@lunn.ch>
References: <1527144984-31236-1-git-send-email-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
 <20180524080528.GD2295@nanopsycho>
 <20180524084831.GA2759@apalos>
 <20180524125431.GB24557@lunn.ch>
 <7437d485-1eac-9619-3827-5af9b32b939e@redhat.com>
 <20180524140831.GA16793@apalos>
 <20180524145441.GE5128@lunn.ch>
 <20180524150704.GA20031@apalos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com,
        ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org, nsekhar@ti.com,
        francois.ozog@linaro.org, yogeshs@ti.com, spatton@ti.com
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:43845 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S966171AbeEXP0C (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 24 May 2018 11:26:02 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180524150704.GA20031@apalos>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> > That i can understand. And it should actually work now with
> > switchdev. It performs IGMP snooping, and if there is nothing joining
> > the group on the CPU, it won't add an MDB entry to forward traffic to
> > the CPU.

> Yes, but this should be configurable (i.e the customer can deny adding the MDB
> on the cpu port)

O.K, back to the basic idea. Switch ports are just normal Linux
interfaces.

How would you configure this with two e1000e put in a bridge? I want
multicast to be bridged between the two e1000e, but the host stack
should not see the packets.

	Andrew