From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] netlink: prepare validate extack setting for recursion
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:48:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920174801.GI10070@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537431250.3874.7.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:14:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Anyway - we got into this discussion because of all the extra recursion
> stuff I was adding. With the change suggested by David we don't need
> that now at all, so I guess it'd be better to propose a patch if you (or
> perhaps I will see a need later) need such a facility for multiple
> messages or multiple message levels?
Yep!
Thanks,
Marcelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 13:12 [RFC 1/5] netlink: remove NLA_NESTED_COMPAT Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 13:12 ` [RFC 2/5] netlink: set extack error message in nla_validate() Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 17:18 ` David Ahern
2018-09-18 17:36 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 13:12 ` [RFC 3/5] netlink: combine validate/parse functions Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 13:12 ` [RFC 4/5] netlink: prepare validate extack setting for recursion Johannes Berg
2018-09-19 3:37 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-09-19 9:25 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-19 9:44 ` Jiri Benc
2018-09-19 18:46 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-09-19 19:19 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-19 21:10 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-09-20 8:14 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-20 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2018-09-19 9:10 ` Jiri Benc
2018-09-19 9:15 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-19 9:28 ` Jiri Benc
2018-09-19 9:44 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 13:12 ` [RFC 5/5] netlink: allow NLA_NESTED to specify nested policy to validate Johannes Berg
2018-09-18 17:18 ` [RFC 1/5] netlink: remove NLA_NESTED_COMPAT David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180920174801.GI10070@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).