On Mon 2018-10-22 19:26:07, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
> 
> Initialize mutex before use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index 8c5853e..88e8d2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,6 @@ static int ksz_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	mutex_init(&dev->reg_mutex);
>  	mutex_init(&dev->stats_mutex);
>  	mutex_init(&dev->alu_mutex);
>  	mutex_init(&dev->vlan_mutex);
> @@ -1207,6 +1206,9 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev)
>  	if (dev->pdata)
>  		dev->chip_id = dev->pdata->chip_id;
>  
> +	/* mutex is used in next function call. */
> +	mutex_init(&dev->reg_mutex);
> +
>  	if (ksz_switch_detect(dev))
>  		return -EINVAL;

Actually, would it make sense to move all mutex_init's there? No harm
in doing them sooner...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html