From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496F6C282D7 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8DF20882 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="iqglBNhN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731363AbfA3Oyy (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:54:54 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:60831 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726915AbfA3Oyy (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:54:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5lWYKsHmAE4r1e//7E7PKX6QyeygySxcblH/Cgc6XiA=; b=iqglBNhN2HN/ToAD4aambRINrX O/mOEaXCQ9Pgk12feWTbhgFHfbmW14X1zEwYQe5lQ9fn1+Z7ocnUTsJ4tx4u1qAoTm5LGFHrddklB qSDuTDrVLzNu9OJt9leUqlDPaJgHI/HWSzNEqnzIbazQWsprNc8DYVlmgiAEIfqdsHCU=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gorGJ-0003Tw-U1; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:54:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:54:47 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Gregory Clement , Antoine Tenart , Maxime Chevallier , Nadav Haklai Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Save switch rules Message-ID: <20190130145447.GB21904@lunn.ch> References: <20190125095507.29334-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20190128152456.212ae5ac@xps13> <20190128144417.GG4765@lunn.ch> <20190128165749.6abf2dc4@xps13> <20190128174246.GD28759@lunn.ch> <20190129100117.5ef6774c@xps13> <20190129145157.GK4765@lunn.ch> <20190129104613.GC20920@t480s.localdomain> <20190130104606.31639abb@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190130104606.31639abb@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > So your proposal is to refuse suspending when using a mv88e6xxx switch. Hi Miquèl That is the first step. It makes the mv88e6xxx suspend compliant, in that it currently does not support suspend. > What about the current situation where suspending is allowed, but all > the configuration gone? That is broken. The whole point of suspending is that you resume back to the original state. Andrew