From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=PwF/=QN=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64768C169C4
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  6 Feb 2019 12:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315842073D
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  6 Feb 2019 12:59:01 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="f+75ojsc"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728044AbfBFM7A (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 6 Feb 2019 07:59:00 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:40948 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726598AbfBFM67 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 6 Feb 2019 07:58:59 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=YI7r9DnAjyAGWvMmCEbEDZdkdnr3uMi52odEx/INpxs=; b=f+75ojscu/Kq2vMY1dEKWlCCyy
        Mi3jjKJEyMMJqAC9K97vZgFeKNELMRYxGvqgHH19M9NCfdncpFuIN+iyKtRJmBA5r05EOisPEyqRD
        GUa8YUci4jnloHakD5RkfwsvUeHbVeUpXrQB/EojoUyzOev4/SV4qJ/kGgyl10Xs7SCQ=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1grMn4-0005Kf-8j; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:58:58 +0100
Date:   Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:58:58 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT net-next 00/10] Modernize mv88e6060 and remove
 legacy probe
Message-ID: <20190206125858.GA20405@lunn.ch>
References: <20190130003758.23852-1-andrew@lunn.ch>
 <87lg2t6tmt.fsf@FE-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lg2t6tmt.fsf@FE-laptop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

> I am asking because this week the dt part can be applied to be merged in
> v5.1, whereas next week, it will be doable but as rc6 will be released
> there will be less chance to be accepted.


Hi Gregory

The DT changes can be applied anyway. They just remove disabled
nodes. I will repost that patch today, without the RFC.

       Andrew