From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/gup: Introduce get_user_pages_fast_longterm()
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:25:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211232510.GP24692@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4htDHmH7PVm_=HOWwRKtpcKTPSjrHPLqhwp2vhBUWL4-w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:55:10PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > I also wonder if someone should think about making fast into a flag
> > too..
> >
> > But I'm not sure when fast should be used vs when it shouldn't :(
>
> Effectively fast should always be used just in case the user cares
> about performance. It's just that it may fail and need to fall back to
> requiring the vma.
But the fall back / slow path is hidden inside the API, so when should
the caller care?
ie when should the caller care to use gup_fast vs gup_unlocked? (the
comments say they are the same, but this seems to be a mistake)
Based on some of the comments in the code it looks like this API is
trying to convert itself into:
long get_user_pages_locked(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
struct vm_area_struct **vmas, bool *locked)
long get_user_pages_unlocked(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages)
(and maybe a FOLL_FAST if there is some reason we have _fast and
_unlocked)
The reason I ask, is that if there is no reason for fast vs unlocked
then maybe Ira should convert HFI to use gup_unlocked and move the
'fast' code into unlocked?
ie move incrementally closer to the desired end-state here.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 20:16 [PATCH 0/3] Add gup fast + longterm and use it in HFI1 ira.weiny
2019-02-11 20:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: Change "write" parameter to flags ira.weiny
2019-02-11 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/gup: Introduce get_user_pages_fast_longterm() ira.weiny
2019-02-11 20:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 21:13 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-11 21:26 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 21:39 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-11 21:45 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 21:52 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 22:01 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-11 22:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 22:55 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 23:04 ` Weiny, Ira
2019-02-11 23:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-02-12 0:08 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 20:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] IB/HFI1: Use new get_user_pages_fast_longterm() ira.weiny
2019-02-11 20:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add gup fast + longterm and use it in HFI1 Davidlohr Bueso
2019-02-11 20:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 21:42 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 22:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 22:40 ` Weiny, Ira
2019-02-11 22:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 21:29 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 20:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 21:14 ` Weiny, Ira
2019-02-11 22:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] Add FOLL_LONGTERM to GUP fast and use it ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] mm/gup: Replace get_user_pages_longterm() with FOLL_LONGTERM ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] mm/gup: Change write parameter to flags in fast walk ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] mm/gup: Change GUP fast to use flags rather than a write 'bool' ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] mm/gup: Add FOLL_LONGTERM capability to GUP fast ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] IB/hfi1: Use the new FOLL_LONGTERM flag to get_user_pages_fast() ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] IB/qib: " ira.weiny
2019-02-13 23:04 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] IB/mthca: " ira.weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211232510.GP24692@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).