From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A1FC43381 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CA82175B for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726692AbfCTRYR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:24:17 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:36108 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726123AbfCTRYR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:24:17 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1h6ewo-000527-6k; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:24:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:24:14 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "David S. Miller" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: Remove tasklet_hrtimer Message-ID: <20190320172413.eduzk7zvsr5dcmx6@linutronix.de> References: <20190301224821.29843-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190301224821.29843-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2019-03-01 23:48:18 [+0100], To netdev@vger.kernel.org wrote: > I just noticed that we still have the tasklet_hrtimer infastructure in tree. A > while ago we tried to remove it. > I digged the old patches up and it seems they did not apply and nobody followed > up. So here they are again. Last two user. davem, what do we here? There is a Reviewed-by tag by Johannes for #1. There is nothing for #2. Should I ping Steffen/Herbert for an ack on #2? Do you prefer to take all three or should tglx/tip apply them (with or without an explicit ack for #2)? Sebastian