netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 08:15:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327151503.5pdaqiwb7ugm3ly4@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df699947253913a7e572fd1252b99e594431e261.camel@debian.org>

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:26:02AM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 18:56 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:14:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   1d382264d911 ("bpf, libbpf: fix version info and add it to shared
> > > object")
> > > 
> > > from the net tree and commit:
> > > 
> > >   60e4786e229d ("tools/bpf: generate pkg-config file for libbpf")
> > > 
> > > from the bpf-next tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> > > tree
> > > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > argh. that's a heavy conflict.
> > Since that patch was at the top of the bpf-next I removed it for now
> > and will re-apply when bpf-next gets merged cleanly into net-next and
> > we bring back net changes into bpf-next. Sorry Luca.
> 
> No worries - for the next time, should I have based the patch on net-
> next rather than bpf-next?

new bpf related features -> bpf-next tree
bpf bugfixes -> bpf tree

Linus hasn't pulled Dave's PR yet: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1066321/
We need these fixes to land his tree first,
then get propagated into net-next and then bpf-next will get them as well.
Sorry for this unfortunate delay.
This lib/bpf/Makefile conflict is not the only one we're waiting for.
There are verifier and other libbpf fixes in there.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-26 22:14 linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-27  1:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-27  9:26   ` Luca Boccassi
2019-03-27 15:15     ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-03-28  1:53       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-28 11:37         ` Luca Boccassi
2019-10-13 23:32 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-15 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-19 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-22  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-22 12:17 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 14:42   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-07-22 15:02     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 15:05       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-07-22 15:25         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 15:49           ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-07-22 17:14             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-23  2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-25  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01  1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-15 23:10 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-28  1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-28  1:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-04-29  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-29 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-29 21:17   ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190327151503.5pdaqiwb7ugm3ly4@ast-mbp \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).