netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	edumazet@google.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	keescook@chromium.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	neilb@suse.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:42:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190603194211.GA228607@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603141847.GA94186@google.com>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:18:47AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 06:27:33PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > +#define list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...)		\
> > > +	if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) {					\
> > > +		__list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond);			\
> > > +	} else {							\
> > > +		__list_check_rcu();					\
> > > +	}								\
> > > +	for (pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member);	\
> > > +		&pos->member != (head);					\
> > >  		pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > @@ -621,7 +648,12 @@ static inline void hlist_add_behind_rcu(struct hlist_node *n,
> > >   * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as hlist_add_head_rcu()
> > >   * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
> > >   */
> > > +#define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...)		\
> > > +	if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) {					\
> > > +		__list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond);			\
> > > +	} else {							\
> > > +		__list_check_rcu();					\
> > > +	}								\
> > >  	for (pos = hlist_entry_safe (rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),\
> > >  			typeof(*(pos)), member);			\
> > >  		pos;							\
> > 
> > 
> > This breaks code like:
> > 
> > 	if (...)
> > 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(...);
> > 
> > as they are no longer a single statement. You'll have to frob it into
> > the initializer part of the for statement.
> 
> Thanks a lot for that. I fixed it as below (diff is on top of the patch):
> 
> If not for that '##' , I could have abstracted the whole if/else
> expression into its own macro and called it from list_for_each_entry_rcu() to
> keep it more clean.

Actually was able to roll the if/else into its own macro as well, thus
keeping it clean. thanks!

---8<-----------------------

diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index b641fdd9f1a2..cc9c382b080c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(struct list_head *list)
 /*
  * Check during list traversal that we are within an RCU reader
  */
-#define __list_check_rcu()						\
+
+#define SIXTH_ARG(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, ...) a6
+#define COUNT_VARGS(...) SIXTH_ARG(dummy, ## __VA_ARGS__, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
+
+#define __list_check_rcu_nocond()					\
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(),			\
 			 "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!")
 
@@ -59,6 +63,16 @@ static inline void __list_check_rcu_cond(int dummy, ...)
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!cond && !rcu_read_lock_any_held(),
 			 "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!");
 }
+
+#define __list_check_rcu(cond...)				\
+     ({								\
+	if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) {				\
+		__list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond);		\
+	} else {						\
+		__list_check_rcu_nocond();			\
+	}							\
+      })
+
 /*
  * Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
  *
@@ -357,9 +371,6 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
 						  member) : NULL; \
 })
 
-#define SIXTH_ARG(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, ...) a6
-#define COUNT_VARGS(...) SIXTH_ARG(dummy, ## __VA_ARGS__, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
-
 /**
  * list_for_each_entry_rcu	-	iterate over rcu list of given type
  * @pos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
@@ -371,12 +382,8 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
  * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
  */
 #define list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...)		\
-	if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) {					\
-		__list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond);			\
-	} else {							\
-		__list_check_rcu();					\
-	}								\
-	for (pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member);	\
+	for (__list_check_rcu(cond),					\
+	     pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member);	\
 		&pos->member != (head);					\
 		pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
 
@@ -649,12 +656,8 @@ static inline void hlist_add_behind_rcu(struct hlist_node *n,
  * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
  */
 #define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...)		\
-	if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) {					\
-		__list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond);			\
-	} else {							\
-		__list_check_rcu();					\
-	}								\
-	for (pos = hlist_entry_safe (rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),\
+	for (__list_check_rcu(cond),					\
+	     pos = hlist_entry_safe (rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),\
 			typeof(*(pos)), member);			\
 		pos;							\
 		pos = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_next_rcu(\
-- 
2.22.0.rc1.311.g5d7573a151-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-03 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-01 22:27 [RFC 0/6] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-03  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 14:18     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-03 19:42       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-06-04 10:53       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-04 17:48         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-04 14:01   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04 23:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 2/6] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-02  7:00   ` Pavel Machek
2019-06-02 12:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-02 12:24       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-03  6:42         ` Pavel Machek
2019-06-03 12:28           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 3/6] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 4/6] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-05  1:24   ` Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:04     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 5/6] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-06-01 22:27 ` [RFC 6/6] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list Joel Fernandes (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190603194211.GA228607@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).