From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B0BC04AB5 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223C820652 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729536AbfFFQan (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 12:30:43 -0400 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:43848 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727054AbfFFQan (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 12:30:43 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56ACC1DFD for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50BADA738 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 90936DA718; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA9CDA703; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Thu, 06 Jun 2019 18:30:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (barqueta.lsi.us.es [150.214.188.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B3CE4265A2F; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:30:35 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Christian Brauner Cc: Stephen Hemminger , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, tyhicks@canonical.com, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, fw@strlen.de, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richardrose@google.com, vapier@chromium.org, bhthompson@google.com, smbarber@chromium.org, joelhockey@chromium.org, ueberall@themenzentrisch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/2] br_netfilter: add struct netns_brnf Message-ID: <20190606163035.x7rvqdwubxiai5t6@salvia> References: <20190606114142.15972-1-christian@brauner.io> <20190606114142.15972-2-christian@brauner.io> <20190606081440.61ea1c62@hermes.lan> <20190606151937.mdpalfk7urvv74ub@brauner.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190606151937.mdpalfk7urvv74ub@brauner.io> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:19:39PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:14:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:41:41 +0200 > > Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > +struct netns_brnf { > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > > > + struct ctl_table_header *ctl_hdr; > > > +#endif > > > + > > > + /* default value is 1 */ > > > + int call_iptables; > > > + int call_ip6tables; > > > + int call_arptables; > > > + > > > + /* default value is 0 */ > > > + int filter_vlan_tagged; > > > + int filter_pppoe_tagged; > > > + int pass_vlan_indev; > > > +}; > > > > Do you really need to waste four bytes for each > > flag value. If you use a u8 that would work just as well. > > I think we had discussed something like this but the problem why we > can't do this stems from how the sysctl-table stuff is implemented. > I distinctly remember that it couldn't be done with a flag due to that. Could you define a pernet_operations object? I mean, define the id and size fields, then pass it to register_pernet_subsys() for registration. Similar to what we do in net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTER.c, see clusterip_net_ops and clusterip_pernet() for instance.