From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03B0C468BD for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 18:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DE3214C6 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 18:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="DdRoSibu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727360AbfFHSqH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 14:46:07 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:38494 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727250AbfFHSqH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 14:46:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GckkiKT1Tl9fO6LvWpZfG2l3m5Hm25MNES0Pnb+Idks=; b=DdRoSibu4fyUvRDIwcM1OuqNS6 a+LPuikSotDadwYYh1beBeOxznXDU31WfjpX0nEKpU6drEp0+qib6XZSAXNS4i8dljW4COw56+iz/ K8g3qUsxj3cJFzfyxit8GMIi9x9GV4hXo5ZhJP6wL0F6zkhea7dhdcOFs5rVceRC3fPQ=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hZgLp-0005wZ-Ev; Sat, 08 Jun 2019 20:46:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 20:46:01 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Jose Abreu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joao Pinto , "David S . Miller" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: Convert to phylink Message-ID: <20190608184601.GA22700@lunn.ch> References: <2528141fcc644205dc1c0a0f2640da1a0e7d5935.1559741195.git.joabreu@synopsys.com> <34db7462-4f5a-155a-d230-e4c90cee1ce3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34db7462-4f5a-155a-d230-e4c90cee1ce3@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > I am not exactly sure removing this is strictly equivalent here, but the > diff makes it hard to review. Yes, diff is doing a poor job here. I already asked Jose if a better diff could be produced by passing extra options. > - add support for PHYLINK (parts of this patch) but without plugging it > into the probe/connect path just yet I don't think this is going to make the diff any better. I might actually just apply the patches and look at the resulting files. Andrew