Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:13:11 -0500
Message-ID: <20190614231311.gfeb47rpjoholuov@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ0dmxYTnaQC1UiSo7MhcTy2KRWJWJKw4jyxFWby-JgRg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:27:30PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:19 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:05:56PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > Have you tested it ?
> > > I really doubt, since in my test both CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC and
> > > CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER failed to unwind through such odd frame.
> >
> > Hm, are you seeing selftest failures?  They seem to work for me.
> >
> > > Here is much simple patch that I mentioned in the email yesterday,
> > > but you failed to listen instead of focusing on perceived 'code readability'.
> > >
> > > It makes one proper frame and both frame and orc unwinders are happy.
> >
> > I'm on my way out the door and I just skimmed it, but it looks fine.
> >
> > Some of the code and patch description look familiar, please be sure to
> > give me proper credit.
> 
> credit means something positive.

So you only give credit for *good* stolen code.  I must have missed that
section of the kernel patch guidelines.

Ironically you posted this patch right after you accused me of removing
Song's SOB (which I didn't).

> your contribution to bpf jit fix was negative.

You have a delightful personality.

-- 
Josh

  reply index

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 17:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel() Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:06     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:16       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-14 21:20         ` Song Liu
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:07     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:09       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:22           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:17             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 23:30               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  0:02                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:06                   ` abhja kaanlani
2019-06-15  0:07                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-17 14:57     ` David Laight
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:13         ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-06-14 23:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:54             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:02               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  4:27                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  5:16                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15 12:57                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614231311.gfeb47rpjoholuov@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kasong@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0 netdev/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1 netdev/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 netdev netdev/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev \
		netdev@vger.kernel.org netdev@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index netdev

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.netdev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox