netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, hawk@kernel.org,
	saeedm@mellanox.com, leon@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net: core: page_pool: add user cnt preventing pool deletion
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:42:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626124216.494eee86@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625175948.24771-2-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:59:45 +0300
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> wrote:

> Add user counter allowing to delete pool only when no users.
> It doesn't prevent pool from flush, only prevents freeing the
> pool instance. Helps when no need to delete the pool and now
> it's user responsibility to free it by calling page_pool_free()
> while destroying procedure. It also makes to use page_pool_free()
> explicitly, not fully hidden in xdp unreg, which looks more
> correct after page pool "create" routine.

No, this is wrong.

> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 8 +++++---
>  include/net/page_pool.h                           | 7 +++++++
>  net/core/page_pool.c                              | 7 +++++++
>  net/core/xdp.c                                    | 3 +++
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 5e40db8f92e6..cb028de64a1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@ -545,10 +545,8 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
>  	}
>  	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xdp_rxq,
>  					 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, rq->page_pool);
> -	if (err) {
> -		page_pool_free(rq->page_pool);
> +	if (err)
>  		goto err_free;
> -	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < wq_sz; i++) {
>  		if (rq->wq_type == MLX5_WQ_TYPE_LINKED_LIST_STRIDING_RQ) {
> @@ -613,6 +611,8 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
>  	if (rq->xdp_prog)
>  		bpf_prog_put(rq->xdp_prog);
>  	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> +	if (rq->page_pool)
> +		page_pool_free(rq->page_pool);
>  	mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
>  
>  	return err;
> @@ -643,6 +643,8 @@ static void mlx5e_free_rq(struct mlx5e_rq *rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> +	if (rq->page_pool)
> +		page_pool_free(rq->page_pool);

No, this is wrong.  The hole point with the merged page_pool fixes
patchset was that page_pool_free() needs to be delayed until no-more
in-flight packets exist.


>  	mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h
> index f07c518ef8a5..1ec838e9927e 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct page_pool {
>  	struct ptr_ring ring;
>  
>  	atomic_t pages_state_release_cnt;
> +	atomic_t user_cnt;
>  };
>  
>  struct page *page_pool_alloc_pages(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
> @@ -183,6 +184,12 @@ static inline dma_addr_t page_pool_get_dma_addr(struct page *page)
>  	return page->dma_addr;
>  }
>  
> +/* used to prevent pool from deallocation */
> +static inline void page_pool_get(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> +	atomic_inc(&pool->user_cnt);
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool is_page_pool_compiled_in(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index b366f59885c1..169b0e3c870e 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	atomic_set(&pool->pages_state_release_cnt, 0);
> +	atomic_set(&pool->user_cnt, 0);
>  
>  	if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP)
>  		get_device(pool->p.dev);
> @@ -70,6 +71,8 @@ struct page_pool *page_pool_create(const struct page_pool_params *params)
>  		kfree(pool);
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  	}
> +
> +	page_pool_get(pool);
>  	return pool;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_create);
> @@ -356,6 +359,10 @@ static void __warn_in_flight(struct page_pool *pool)
>  
>  void __page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
>  {
> +	/* free only if no users */
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->user_cnt))
> +		return;
> +
>  	WARN(pool->alloc.count, "API usage violation");
>  	WARN(!ptr_ring_empty(&pool->ring), "ptr_ring is not empty");
>  
> diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> index 829377cc83db..04bdcd784d2e 100644
> --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,9 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
>  
> +	if (type == MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL)
> +		page_pool_get(xdp_alloc->page_pool);
> +
>  	trace_mem_connect(xdp_alloc, xdp_rxq);
>  	return 0;
>  err:



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-25 17:59 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net: core: page_pool: add user cnt preventing pool deletion Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26  1:36   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-26 14:01     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 10:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2019-06-26 10:49     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 11:51       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-26 12:39         ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-27 19:44   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-27 22:02     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-28  6:35       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-28  8:53         ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: add dma mapped submit Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: return handler status Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26  2:17   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add " David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190626124216.494eee86@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).