From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119DEC5B57B for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 23:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85BB215EA for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 23:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="ALvI80KR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726957AbfF2XLV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:11:21 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:43348 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726942AbfF2XLV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:11:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=L6GfLA/rkyEsf3aUbhTEHivTi5OAhnQC3dk1Hx4xbVw=; b=ALvI80KRnPMFjo4dEgP1+pzFC+ PKTS4XwlFe1pBidVY2SSJ0sWrbnJRMqUBpuRzM5Nv8YWMpOpNi/hmTeomFRCBAUE8+adIONfTc2Ww Jqu1UvNCuXjtb2R0csJuaWxG5CWQHvXtZKHIUl1xIaVIcLcSye4l34xOZx51hD0flcYg=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hhMV5-0007EK-ES; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 01:11:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 01:11:19 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: vtolkm@gmail.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: loss of connectivity after enabling vlan_filtering Message-ID: <20190629231119.GC26554@lunn.ch> References: <20190629224927.GA26554@lunn.ch> <6226b473-b232-e1d3-40e9-18d118dd82c4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6226b473-b232-e1d3-40e9-18d118dd82c4@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 01:04:50AM +0200, vtolkm@googlemail.com wrote: > > On 30/06/2019 00:49, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:01:38AM +0200, vtolkm@googlemail.com wrote: > >> * DSA MV88E6060 > >> * iproute2 v.5.0.0-2.0 > >> * OpenWRT 19.07 with kernel 4.14.131 armv7l > > The mv88e6060 driver is very simple. It has no support for VLANs. It > > does not even have support for offloading bridging between ports to > > the switch. > > > > The data sheet for this device is open. So if you want to hack on the > > driver, you could do. > > > > Andrew > > Are you sure? That is a bit confusing after reading > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/575746/ Quoting that patch: This commit implements the switchdev operations to add, delete and dump VLANs for the Marvell 88E6352 and compatible switch chips. Vivien added support for the 6352. That uses the mv88e6xxx driver, not the mv88e6060. And by compatible switches, he meant those in the 6352 family, so 6172 6176 6240 6352 and probably the 6171 6175 6350 6351. Andrew