From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9534AC5B57E for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 08:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6969A20645 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 08:53:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1561884820; bh=yMg2MekXRUw/XD9/h6dc2/qckNEFchtjI/TJ9i3JMbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=h+figRxBE0bhfwDrluM3FEb7muUh8m+boPYn7bjWj66+k1jkgOqBzc6N7J59uxhFR yX+PZhsQZFTWUA8s2akcmczRjSIxIA6SagLfbihH+XYbcH13LgO5Hk1b7YJYTDl20r ZRoHQLamvzhDseKAcjkeS/mgDdAsFfz+d1EWuq5M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726571AbfF3Ixj (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:53:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50630 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726482AbfF3Ixj (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2019 04:53:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [193.47.165.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF51C20449; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 08:53:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1561884818; bh=yMg2MekXRUw/XD9/h6dc2/qckNEFchtjI/TJ9i3JMbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bTRSK+Yetsr5m5r8oFZYE7qrmx434T1p8jQE38LvJ4fr0tmI9M/PafoKutHOP510L P+S4c3AizQy/kE6e244+P5Ixv/FozuYOA3+1tYBVTVSwTez6jtikh9xtDKhc1aI35x NBNncYcJvanGWil7GyKdcfbB3DKxab4QA+CEZkOg= Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:53:35 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Yishai Hadas , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "dledford@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 00/12] DEVX asynchronous events Message-ID: <20190630085335.GD4727@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> References: <20190618171540.11729-1-leon@kernel.org> <19107c92279cf4ad4d870fa54514423c5e46b748.camel@mellanox.com> <20190619044557.GA11611@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 09:57:05PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 07:45 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 06:51:45PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 20:15 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky > > > > > > > > Changelog: > > > > v0 -> v1: > > > > > > Normally 1st submission is V1 and 2nd is V2. > > > so this should have been v1->v2. > > > > "Normally" depends on the language you are using. In C, everything > > starts from 0, including version of patches :). > > > > You are wrong: > quoting: https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchTipsAndTricks > > "For example, if you're sending the second revision of a patch, you > should use [PATCH v2]." > > now don't tell me that second revision is actually 3rd revision or 1st > is 2nd :).. :) If you don't mind, I will stick to common sense (v0, v1, v2 ...) and official kernel documentation, which mentions existence of v1. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L682 > > > > For mlx5-next patches: > > > > > > Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed > > > > Thanks