From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
grygorii.strashko@ti.com, davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:09:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701180947.GA11915@apalos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701181901.150c0b71@carbon>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:23:48 +0300
> Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > +static int cpsw_ndev_create_xdp_rxq(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch)
> > +{
> > + struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
> > + int ret, new_pool = false;
> > + struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
> > +
> > + rxq = &priv->xdp_rxq[ch];
> > +
> > + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg(rxq, priv->ndev, ch);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (!cpsw->page_pool[ch]) {
> > + ret = cpsw_create_rx_pool(cpsw, ch);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_rxq;
> > +
> > + new_pool = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(rxq, MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL,
> > + cpsw->page_pool[ch]);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (new_pool) {
> > + page_pool_free(cpsw->page_pool[ch]);
> > + cpsw->page_pool[ch] = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > +err_rxq:
> > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(rxq);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> Looking at this, and Ilias'es XDP-netsec error handling path, it might
> be a mistake that I removed page_pool_destroy() and instead put the
> responsibility on xdp_rxq_info_unreg().
>
> As here, we have to detect if page_pool_create() was a success, and then
> if xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() was a failure, explicitly call
> page_pool_free() because the xdp_rxq_info_unreg() call cannot "free"
> the page_pool object given it was not registered.
>
> Ivan's patch in[1], might be a better approach, which forced all
> drivers to explicitly call page_pool_free(), even-though it just
> dec-refcnt and the real call to page_pool_free() happened via
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg().
We did discuss that xdp_XXXXX naming might be confusing.
That being said since Ivan's approach serves 'special' hardware and fixes the
naming irregularity, i perfectly fine doing that as long as we clearly document
that the API is supposed to serve a pool per queue (unless the hardware needs to
deal with it differently)
>
> To better handle error path, I would re-introduce page_pool_destroy(),
> as a driver API, that would gracefully handle NULL-pointer case, and
> then call page_pool_free() with the atomic_dec_and_test(). (It should
> hopefully simplify the error handling code a bit)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190625175948.24771-2-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org/
>
>
Thanks
/Ilias
> > +void cpsw_ndev_destroy_xdp_rxqs(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > + struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
> > + struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cpsw->rx_ch_num; i++) {
> > + rxq = &priv->xdp_rxq[i];
> > + if (xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(rxq))
> > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(rxq);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Are you sure you need to test xdp_rxq_info_is_reg() here?
>
> You should just call xdp_rxq_info_unreg(rxq), if you know that this rxq
> should be registered. If your assumption failed, you will get a
> WARNing, and discover your driver level bug. This is one of the ways
> the API is designed to "detect" misuse of the API. (I found this
> rather useful, when I converted the approx 12 drivers using this
> xdp_rxq_info API).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-30 17:23 [PATCH v5 net-next 0/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 1/6] xdp: allow same allocator usage Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-01 11:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 10:27 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 14:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 14:53 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 2/6] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: add dma mapped submit Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 3/6] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: return handler status Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 4/6] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: allow desc split while down Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 5/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw_ethtool: allow res " Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-30 17:23 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-01 16:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-01 18:09 ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2019-07-02 11:37 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 13:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 14:24 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 14:31 ` [PATCH] net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and reintroduce page_pool_destroy Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 14:44 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 14:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 14:56 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 15:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 15:21 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 18:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 18:58 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 20:28 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-02 21:02 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-02 21:15 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-07-02 21:41 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-07-03 7:26 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-03 7:38 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190701180947.GA11915@apalos \
--to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).