From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71DAC76195 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAE821849 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Nn2uvpW2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390323AbfGRQlZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:37785 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389858AbfGRQlZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:41:25 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 19so12883112pfa.4; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6rXfAOSyMwNydp+7fmtGTEr8JM70VS1PI32cRhPTo2c=; b=Nn2uvpW25U33GY3F7gF4xsSBi/LCRa96KOW4alT4IeiDuZDJOuOvQp/chZwhmPwhCY XrVmyAGC/rkyXbpLWxooQrHdOA7n+UHwGGCeCSdUwUsZl2mzQ7KcdN/n0SfDrKiKlaXM 4D2dcW11mg5cwSm23/B5QDL7t2fnsbc67TOV5eM5PIcPEhZ+XZUGMl0J/XT6Hac9DaXR yZ60uH8W4oRybCQ9TIkeLetVZqE5tXqMIjNU8VwegHg8Uqq42mO3BRNz14CM5nXytN+V ZVbubU3cMDpWPThDt3Qa7W3ihsR9ByaLKDRuFz1HEJaOFHSgPQWK3GtvBgjj7Q4aDrZS Ln4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6rXfAOSyMwNydp+7fmtGTEr8JM70VS1PI32cRhPTo2c=; b=LIrioA03Qip7GHwLCCyCusDgrwrCiHnDQj+3LU3ZAG0dnL6ENvJF8qRcSBmJORIArq A3+OgFcIWJKL6EJYtQW4Qkn0OtsnbE9dDCICpWfwl5DWzXlA8/kE8dUCizZ+m8t1nbXt LIjAGyezbN7Wcx2XpGV2+C22XTpf8KU6MMMlLxxbc0BrfFxw49wBfx6BakXPUEVnuxOg TZN/7qSDGibGHCAo2mJg9t/6pdgEk4wURWMNL8tr4YpOGi/ji3bC7BCBiuKOSVibYo04 Hr+fitjiZafKrqM7evaHGWHNjqjnMNcxQsz8Y7eCxWXSbUDECLslrkJ11L9bPe0uFJVL Df+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUEJBaVGuJKhjc1XqOkiUqYiQDyVD/GTvA1zfysE4nii4ZqiFwz mOLXCri+5tHuwV7IEgPhulI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwKz2mpCqXvBYtJLAKEvoXIkVXorTIADsH/2NMAdWM6vDdkXoBav4Yde8I7/FZed4NJVJyYOw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2606:: with SMTP id m6mr48408098pgm.436.1563468084713; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-222-71-142.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.222.71.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f15sm28866625pje.17.2019.07.18.09.41.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:41:21 -0700 From: Richard Cochran To: Felipe Balbi Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Christopher S . Hall" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] PTP: Add flag for non-periodic output Message-ID: <20190718164121.GB1533@localhost> References: <20190716072038.8408-1-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> <20190716072038.8408-5-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> <20190716163927.GA2125@localhost> <87k1ch2m1i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <20190717173645.GD1464@localhost> <87ftn3iuqp.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ftn3iuqp.fsf@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:59:10AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > no problem, anything in particular in mind? Just create new versions of > all the IOCTLs so we can actually use the reserved fields in the future? Yes, please! Thanks, Richard