From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, dsahern@gmail.com, dcbw@redhat.com,
mkubecek@suse.cz, andrew@lunn.ch, parav@mellanox.com,
saeedm@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next rfc 7/7] net: rtnetlink: add possibility to use alternative names as message handle
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:59:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719205927.6638187f@cakuba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190719110029.29466-8-jiri@resnulli.us>
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:00:29 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 1fa30d514e3f..68ad12a7fc4d 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -1793,6 +1793,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
> [IFLA_MAX_MTU] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> [IFLA_ALT_IFNAME_MOD] = { .type = NLA_STRING,
> .len = ALTIFNAMSIZ - 1 },
> + [IFLA_ALT_IFNAME] = { .type = NLA_STRING,
> + .len = ALTIFNAMSIZ - 1 },
What's the disadvantage of just letting IFLA_IFNAME to get longer
on input? Is it just that the handling would be asymmetrical?
> };
>
> static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-20 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 11:00 [patch net-next rfc 0/7] net: introduce alternative names for network interfaces Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 1/7] net: procfs: use index hashlist instead of name hashlist Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 2/7] net: introduce name_node struct to be used in hashlist Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 16:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-19 19:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 20:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-20 7:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-09-13 9:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-08 4:34 ` kbuild test robot
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 3/7] net: rtnetlink: add commands to add and delete alternative ifnames Jiri Pirko
2019-07-20 3:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-20 7:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-09 4:11 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-09 6:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-09 15:40 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-09 15:46 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-10 13:46 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-10 15:50 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-10 19:39 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-11 22:10 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-12 15:21 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-12 15:43 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-09 16:14 ` David Ahern
2019-08-10 6:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-12 1:34 ` David Ahern
2019-08-12 1:37 ` David Ahern
2019-08-12 8:31 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-12 15:13 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-12 21:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-13 0:29 ` David Ahern
2019-08-13 6:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-13 6:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-12 15:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-12 16:23 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-13 6:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-12 16:01 ` David Ahern
2019-08-13 6:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-26 16:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-26 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-26 21:46 ` David Ahern
2019-08-26 22:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-26 22:18 ` David Miller
2019-08-26 22:24 ` David Ahern
2019-08-26 22:25 ` David Miller
2019-08-27 0:17 ` David Ahern
2019-08-27 5:09 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-27 7:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-27 8:22 ` David Miller
2019-08-27 9:35 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-27 15:14 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-28 7:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-29 4:36 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-29 5:26 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-30 14:35 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-08-30 14:47 ` David Ahern
2019-08-30 17:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-30 14:49 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-30 17:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-09-12 11:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-09-13 8:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-09-13 14:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-08-27 4:55 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-08-27 13:43 ` David Ahern
2019-08-10 6:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 4/7] net: rtnetlink: put alternative names to getlink message Jiri Pirko
2019-07-20 3:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-20 7:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 5/7] net: rtnetlink: unify the code in __rtnl_newlink get dev with the rest Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 6/7] net: rtnetlink: introduce helper to get net_device instance by ifname Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:00 ` [patch net-next rfc 7/7] net: rtnetlink: add possibility to use alternative names as message handle Jiri Pirko
2019-07-20 3:59 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-07-20 7:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:03 ` [patch iproute2 rfc 1/2] ip: add support for alternative name addition/deletion/list Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 11:03 ` [patch iproute2 rfc 2/2] ip: allow to use alternative names as handle Jiri Pirko
2019-07-19 16:31 ` [patch net-next rfc 0/7] net: introduce alternative names for network interfaces Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-19 19:16 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190719205927.6638187f@cakuba \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).