netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229)
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 1/7] net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

This patchset introduces support for TCP encapsulation of IKE and ESP
messages, as defined by RFC 8229 [0]. It is an evolution of what
Herbert Xu proposed in January 2018 [1] that addresses the main
criticism against it, by not interfering with the TCP implementation
at all. The networking stack now has infrastructure for this: TCP ULPs
and Stream Parsers.

The first patches are preparation and refactoring, and the final patch
adds the feature.

The main omission in this submission is IPv6 support. ESP
encapsulation over UDP with IPv6 is currently not supported in the
kernel either, as UDP encapsulation is aimed at NAT traversal, and NAT
is not frequently used with IPv6.

Some of the code is taken directly, or slightly modified, from Herbert
Xu's original submission [1]. The ULP and strparser pieces are
new. This work was presented and discussed at the IPsec workshop and
netdev 0x13 conference [2] in Prague, last March.

[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8229
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/859107/
[2] https://netdevconf.org/0x13/session.html?talk-ipsec-encap

Herbert Xu (1):
  skbuff: Avoid sleeping in skb_send_sock_locked

Sabrina Dubroca (6):
  net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and
    __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram
  xfrm: introduce xfrm_trans_queue_net
  xfrm: add route lookup to xfrm4_rcv_encap
  esp4: prepare esp_input_done2 for non-UDP encapsulation
  esp4: split esp_output_udp_encap and introduce esp_output_encap
  xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229)

 include/linux/skbuff.h    |  11 +-
 include/net/espintcp.h    |  38 +++
 include/net/xfrm.h        |   4 +
 include/uapi/linux/udp.h  |   1 +
 net/core/datagram.c       |  26 +-
 net/core/skbuff.c         |   1 +
 net/ipv4/esp4.c           | 262 ++++++++++++++++++--
 net/ipv4/udp.c            |   3 +-
 net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c |   9 +
 net/unix/af_unix.c        |   7 +-
 net/xfrm/Kconfig          |   9 +
 net/xfrm/Makefile         |   1 +
 net/xfrm/espintcp.c       | 505 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c     |  21 +-
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c    |   7 +
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c     |   3 +
 16 files changed, 862 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/net/espintcp.h
 create mode 100644 net/xfrm/espintcp.c

-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 1/7] net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 2/7] skbuff: Avoid sleeping in skb_send_sock_locked Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

This will be used by ESP over TCP to handle the queue of IKE messages.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h | 11 ++++++++---
 net/core/datagram.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 net/ipv4/udp.c         |  3 ++-
 net/unix/af_unix.c     |  7 ++++---
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 98ff5ac98caa..149c542115a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -3377,7 +3377,8 @@ static inline void skb_frag_list_init(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	for (iter = skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list; iter; iter = iter->next)
 
 
-int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p,
+int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff_head *queue,
+				int *err, long *timeo_p,
 				const struct sk_buff *skb);
 struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_from_queue(struct sock *sk,
 					  struct sk_buff_head *queue,
@@ -3386,12 +3387,16 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_from_queue(struct sock *sk,
 							   struct sk_buff *skb),
 					  int *off, int *err,
 					  struct sk_buff **last);
-struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags,
+struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk,
+					struct sk_buff_head *queue,
+					unsigned int flags,
 					void (*destructor)(struct sock *sk,
 							   struct sk_buff *skb),
 					int *off, int *err,
 					struct sk_buff **last);
-struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags,
+struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk,
+				    struct sk_buff_head *sk_queue,
+				    unsigned int flags,
 				    void (*destructor)(struct sock *sk,
 						       struct sk_buff *skb),
 				    int *off, int *err);
diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index 45a162ef5e02..5fe681e1f4ae 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static int receiver_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned int mode, i
 /*
  * Wait for the last received packet to be different from skb
  */
-int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p,
+int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff_head *queue,
+				int *err, long *timeo_p,
 				const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	int error;
@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p,
 	if (error)
 		goto out_err;
 
-	if (sk->sk_receive_queue.prev != skb)
+	if (queue->prev != skb)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Socket shut down? */
@@ -241,13 +242,14 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_from_queue(struct sock *sk,
  *	quite explicitly by POSIX 1003.1g, don't change them without having
  *	the standard around please.
  */
-struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
+struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk,
+					struct sk_buff_head *queue,
+					unsigned int flags,
 					void (*destructor)(struct sock *sk,
 							   struct sk_buff *skb),
 					int *off, int *err,
 					struct sk_buff **last)
 {
-	struct sk_buff_head *queue = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned long cpu_flags;
 	/*
@@ -278,7 +280,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
 			break;
 
 		sk_busy_loop(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
-	} while (sk->sk_receive_queue.prev != *last);
+	} while (queue->prev != *last);
 
 	error = -EAGAIN;
 
@@ -288,7 +290,9 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_try_recv_datagram);
 
-struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
+struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk,
+				    struct sk_buff_head *sk_queue,
+				    unsigned int flags,
 				    void (*destructor)(struct sock *sk,
 						       struct sk_buff *skb),
 				    int *off, int *err)
@@ -299,15 +303,16 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
 	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
 
 	do {
-		skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, flags, destructor, off, err,
-					      &last);
+		skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, sk_queue, flags, destructor,
+					      off, err, &last);
 		if (skb)
 			return skb;
 
 		if (*err != -EAGAIN)
 			break;
 	} while (timeo &&
-		!__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, err, &timeo, last));
+		 !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, sk_queue, err,
+					      &timeo, last));
 
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -318,7 +323,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
 {
 	int off = 0;
 
-	return __skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0),
+	return __skb_recv_datagram(sk, &sk->sk_receive_queue,
+				   flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0),
 				   NULL, &off, err);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_recv_datagram);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 8fb250ed53d4..40067fc4c82b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1690,7 +1690,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_udp(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
 
 		/* sk_queue is empty, reader_queue may contain peeked packets */
 	} while (timeo &&
-		 !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, &error, &timeo,
+		 !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, &sk->sk_receive_queue,
+					      &error, &timeo,
 					      (struct sk_buff *)sk_queue));
 
 	*err = error;
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index e68d7454f2e3..91c1ffd82ff9 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2053,8 +2053,8 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
 
 		skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
-		skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, flags, NULL, &skip, &err,
-					      &last);
+		skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, &sk->sk_receive_queue, flags,
+					      NULL, &skip, &err, &last);
 		if (skb)
 			break;
 
@@ -2063,7 +2063,8 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		if (err != -EAGAIN)
 			break;
 	} while (timeo &&
-		 !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, &err, &timeo, last));
+		 !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, &sk->sk_receive_queue,
+					      &err, &timeo, last));
 
 	if (!skb) { /* implies iolock unlocked */
 		unix_state_lock(sk);
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 2/7] skbuff: Avoid sleeping in skb_send_sock_locked
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 1/7] net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 3/7] xfrm: introduce xfrm_trans_queue_net Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

For a function that needs to be called with the socket spinlock
held, sleeping would seem to be a bad idea.  This function does
in fact avoid sleeping when calling kernel_sendpage_locked on the
page part of the skb.  However, it doesn't do that when sending
the linear part.  Resulting in sleeping when the socket send buffer
is full.

This patch fixes it by setting the MSG_DONTWAIT flag when calling
kernel_sendmsg_locked.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index b50a5e3ac4e4..f863c7ef417c 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -2367,6 +2367,7 @@ int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
 		kv.iov_base = skb->data + offset;
 		kv.iov_len = slen;
 		memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+		msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
 
 		ret = kernel_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, &kv, 1, slen);
 		if (ret <= 0)
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 3/7] xfrm: introduce xfrm_trans_queue_net
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 1/7] net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 2/7] skbuff: Avoid sleeping in skb_send_sock_locked Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 4/7] xfrm: add route lookup to xfrm4_rcv_encap Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

This will be used by TCP encapsulation to write packets to the encap
socket without holding the user socket's lock. Without this reinjection,
we're already holding the lock of the user socket, and then try to lock
the encap socket as well when we enqueue the encrypted packet.

While at it, add a BUILD_BUG_ON like we usually do for skb->cb, since
it's missing for struct xfrm_trans_cb.

Co-developed-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 include/net/xfrm.h    |  3 +++
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 56b31676e330..eec06cd33b26 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1551,6 +1551,9 @@ int __xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x, bool init_replay, bool offload);
 int xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x);
 int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type);
 int xfrm_input_resume(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr);
+int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			 int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
+				       struct sk_buff *));
 int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		     int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
 				   struct sk_buff *));
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 6088bc2dc11e..eb0f0e64c71c 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct xfrm_trans_cb {
 #endif
 	} header;
 	int (*finish)(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+	struct net *net;
 };
 
 #define XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct xfrm_trans_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
@@ -763,12 +764,13 @@ static void xfrm_trans_reinject(unsigned long data)
 	skb_queue_splice_init(&trans->queue, &queue);
 
 	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue)))
-		XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish(dev_net(skb->dev), NULL, skb);
+		XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish(XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net,
+					       NULL, skb);
 }
 
-int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
-		     int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
-				   struct sk_buff *))
+int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			 int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
+				       struct sk_buff *))
 {
 	struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans;
 
@@ -777,11 +779,22 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb_queue_len(&trans->queue) >= netdev_max_backlog)
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xfrm_trans_cb) > sizeof(skb->cb));
+
 	XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
+	XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net = net;
 	__skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
 	tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_trans_queue_net);
+
+int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
+		     int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
+				   struct sk_buff *))
+{
+	return xfrm_trans_queue_net(dev_net(skb->dev), skb, finish);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_trans_queue);
 
 void __init xfrm_input_init(void)
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 4/7] xfrm: add route lookup to xfrm4_rcv_encap
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 3/7] xfrm: introduce xfrm_trans_queue_net Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 5/7] esp4: prepare esp_input_done2 for non-UDP encapsulation Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

At this point, with TCP encapsulation, the dst may be gone, but
xfrm_input needs one.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
index bcab48944c15..1665e1a05ec5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
@@ -76,6 +76,14 @@ int xfrm4_rcv_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 	if (!head)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (!skb_dst(skb)) {
+		const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
+
+		if (ip_route_input_noref(skb, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
+					 iph->tos, skb->dev))
+			goto drop;
+	}
+
 	for_each_protocol_rcu(*head, handler)
 		if ((ret = handler->input_handler(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type)) != -EINVAL)
 			return ret;
@@ -83,6 +91,7 @@ int xfrm4_rcv_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 out:
 	icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_PORT_UNREACH, 0);
 
+drop:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 5/7] esp4: prepare esp_input_done2 for non-UDP encapsulation
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 4/7] xfrm: add route lookup to xfrm4_rcv_encap Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 6/7] esp4: split esp_output_udp_encap and introduce esp_output_encap Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

For espintcp encapsulation, we will need to get the source port from the
TCP header instead of UDP. Introduce a variable to hold the port.

Co-developed-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 net/ipv4/esp4.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index c06562aded11..5608dd47ee97 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -603,6 +603,18 @@ int esp_input_done2(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 	if (x->encap) {
 		struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap = x->encap;
 		struct udphdr *uh = (void *)(skb_network_header(skb) + ihl);
+		__be16 source;
+
+		switch (x->encap->encap_type) {
+		case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP:
+		case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE:
+			source = uh->source;
+			break;
+		default:
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * 1) if the NAT-T peer's IP or port changed then
@@ -611,11 +623,11 @@ int esp_input_done2(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 		 *    SRC ports.
 		 */
 		if (iph->saddr != x->props.saddr.a4 ||
-		    uh->source != encap->encap_sport) {
+		    source != encap->encap_sport) {
 			xfrm_address_t ipaddr;
 
 			ipaddr.a4 = iph->saddr;
-			km_new_mapping(x, &ipaddr, uh->source);
+			km_new_mapping(x, &ipaddr, source);
 
 			/* XXX: perhaps add an extra
 			 * policy check here, to see
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 6/7] esp4: split esp_output_udp_encap and introduce esp_output_encap
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 5/7] esp4: prepare esp_input_done2 for non-UDP encapsulation Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 7/7] xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-08-16 14:18 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support " Sabrina Dubroca
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

Co-developed-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 net/ipv4/esp4.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 5608dd47ee97..344660e2a17b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -227,45 +227,62 @@ static void esp_output_fill_trailer(u8 *tail, int tfclen, int plen, __u8 proto)
 	tail[plen - 1] = proto;
 }
 
-static int esp_output_udp_encap(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *esp)
+static struct ip_esp_hdr *esp_output_udp_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					       int encap_type,
+					       struct esp_info *esp,
+					       __be16 sport,
+					       __be16 dport)
 {
-	int encap_type;
 	struct udphdr *uh;
 	__be32 *udpdata32;
-	__be16 sport, dport;
-	struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap = x->encap;
-	struct ip_esp_hdr *esph = esp->esph;
 	unsigned int len;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
-	sport = encap->encap_sport;
-	dport = encap->encap_dport;
-	encap_type = encap->encap_type;
-	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
-
 	len = skb->len + esp->tailen - skb_transport_offset(skb);
 	if (len + sizeof(struct iphdr) >= IP_MAX_MTU)
-		return -EMSGSIZE;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
 
-	uh = (struct udphdr *)esph;
+	uh = (struct udphdr *)esp->esph;
 	uh->source = sport;
 	uh->dest = dport;
 	uh->len = htons(len);
 	uh->check = 0;
 
+	*skb_mac_header(skb) = IPPROTO_UDP;
+
+	if (encap_type == UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE) {
+		udpdata32 = (__be32 *)(uh + 1);
+		udpdata32[0] = udpdata32[1] = 0;
+		return (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(udpdata32 + 2);
+	}
+
+	return (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(uh + 1);
+}
+
+static int esp_output_encap(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			    struct esp_info *esp)
+{
+	struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap = x->encap;
+	struct ip_esp_hdr *esph;
+	__be16 sport, dport;
+	int encap_type;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+	sport = encap->encap_sport;
+	dport = encap->encap_dport;
+	encap_type = encap->encap_type;
+	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
+
 	switch (encap_type) {
 	default:
 	case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP:
-		esph = (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(uh + 1);
-		break;
 	case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE:
-		udpdata32 = (__be32 *)(uh + 1);
-		udpdata32[0] = udpdata32[1] = 0;
-		esph = (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(udpdata32 + 2);
+		esph = esp_output_udp_encap(skb, encap_type, esp, sport, dport);
 		break;
 	}
 
-	*skb_mac_header(skb) = IPPROTO_UDP;
+	if (IS_ERR(esph))
+		return PTR_ERR(esph);
+
 	esp->esph = esph;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -283,7 +300,7 @@ int esp_output_head(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
 
 	/* this is non-NULL only with UDP Encapsulation */
 	if (x->encap) {
-		int err = esp_output_udp_encap(x, skb, esp);
+		int err = esp_output_encap(x, skb, esp);
 
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 7/7] xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229)
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 6/7] esp4: split esp_output_udp_encap and introduce esp_output_encap Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-06-25 10:11 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-08-16 14:18 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support " Sabrina Dubroca
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-06-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Steffen Klassert, Sabrina Dubroca

TCP encapsulation of IKE and IPsec messages (RFC 8229) is implemented
as a TCP ULP, overriding in particular the sendmsg and recvmsg
operations. A Stream Parser is used to extract messages out of the TCP
stream using the first 2 bytes as length marker. Received IKE messages
are put on "ike_queue", waiting to be dequeued by the custom recvmsg
implementation. Received ESP messages are sent to XFRM, like with UDP
encapsulation.

Some of this code is taken from the original submission by Herbert
Xu. Currently, only IPv4 is supported, like for UDP encapsulation.

Co-developed-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
---
 include/net/espintcp.h   |  38 +++
 include/net/xfrm.h       |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/udp.h |   1 +
 net/ipv4/esp4.c          | 189 ++++++++++++++-
 net/xfrm/Kconfig         |   9 +
 net/xfrm/Makefile        |   1 +
 net/xfrm/espintcp.c      | 505 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c   |   7 +
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c    |   3 +
 9 files changed, 751 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/net/espintcp.h
 create mode 100644 net/xfrm/espintcp.c

diff --git a/include/net/espintcp.h b/include/net/espintcp.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..02fc28c82d30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/net/espintcp.h
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _NET_ESPINTCP_H
+#define _NET_ESPINTCP_H
+
+#include <net/strparser.h>
+#include <linux/skmsg.h>
+
+void __init espintcp_init(void);
+
+int espintcp_push_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+int espintcp_queue_out(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+bool tcp_is_ulp_esp(struct sock *sk);
+
+struct espintcp_msg {
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct sk_msg skmsg;
+	int offset;
+	int len;
+};
+
+struct espintcp_ctx {
+	struct strparser strp;
+	struct sk_buff_head ike_queue;
+	struct sk_buff_head out_queue;
+	struct espintcp_msg partial;
+	void (*saved_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
+	void (*saved_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
+	struct work_struct work;
+	bool tx_running;
+};
+
+static inline struct espintcp_ctx *espintcp_getctx(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
+
+	return icsk->icsk_ulp_data;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index eec06cd33b26..e71ca4b3615e 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct xfrm_state {
 
 	/* Data for encapsulator */
 	struct xfrm_encap_tmpl	*encap;
+	struct sock __rcu	*encap_sk;
 
 	/* Data for care-of address */
 	xfrm_address_t	*coaddr;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/udp.h b/include/uapi/linux/udp.h
index 30baccb6c9c4..4828794efcf8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/udp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/udp.h
@@ -42,5 +42,6 @@ struct udphdr {
 #define UDP_ENCAP_GTP0		4 /* GSM TS 09.60 */
 #define UDP_ENCAP_GTP1U		5 /* 3GPP TS 29.060 */
 #define UDP_ENCAP_RXRPC		6
+#define TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP	7 /* Yikes, this is really xfrm encap types. */
 
 #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_UDP_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 344660e2a17b..5a53fb67c886 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
 #include <net/icmp.h>
 #include <net/protocol.h>
 #include <net/udp.h>
+#include <net/tcp.h>
+#include <net/espintcp.h>
 
 #include <linux/highmem.h>
 
@@ -119,6 +121,129 @@ static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp)
 			put_page(sg_page(sg));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+struct esp_tcp_sk {
+	struct sock *sk;
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
+};
+
+static void esp_free_tcp_sk(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct esp_tcp_sk *esk = container_of(head, struct esp_tcp_sk, rcu);
+
+	sock_put(esk->sk);
+	kfree(esk);
+}
+
+static struct sock *esp_find_tcp_sk(struct xfrm_state *x)
+{
+	struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap = x->encap;
+	struct esp_tcp_sk *esk;
+	__be16 sport, dport;
+	struct sock *nsk;
+	struct sock *sk;
+
+	sk = rcu_dereference(x->encap_sk);
+	if (sk && sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+		return sk;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+	sport = encap->encap_sport;
+	dport = encap->encap_dport;
+	nsk = rcu_dereference_protected(x->encap_sk,
+					lockdep_is_held(&x->lock));
+	if (sk && sk == nsk) {
+		esk = kmalloc(sizeof(*esk), GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!esk) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
+			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		}
+		RCU_INIT_POINTER(x->encap_sk, NULL);
+		esk->sk = sk;
+		call_rcu(&esk->rcu, esp_free_tcp_sk);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
+
+	sk = inet_lookup_established(xs_net(x), &tcp_hashinfo, x->id.daddr.a4,
+				     dport, x->props.saddr.a4, sport, 0);
+	if (!sk)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	if (!tcp_is_ulp_esp(sk)) {
+		sock_put(sk);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+	nsk = rcu_dereference_protected(x->encap_sk,
+					lockdep_is_held(&x->lock));
+	if (encap->encap_sport != sport ||
+	    encap->encap_dport != dport) {
+		sock_put(sk);
+		sk = nsk ?: ERR_PTR(-EREMCHG);
+	} else if (sk == nsk) {
+		sock_put(sk);
+	} else {
+		rcu_assign_pointer(x->encap_sk, sk);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
+
+	return sk;
+}
+
+static int esp_output_tcp_finish(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct sock *sk;
+	int err;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+	sk = esp_find_tcp_sk(x);
+	err = PTR_ERR(sk);
+	if (IS_ERR(sk))
+		goto out;
+
+	bh_lock_sock(sk);
+	if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
+		err = espintcp_queue_out(sk, skb);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto unlock_sock;
+	} else {
+		err = espintcp_push_skb(sk, skb);
+	}
+
+unlock_sock:
+	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int esp_output_tcp_encap_cb(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+				   struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
+	struct xfrm_state *x = dst->xfrm;
+
+	return esp_output_tcp_finish(x, skb);
+}
+
+static int esp_output_tail_tcp(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	local_bh_disable();
+	err = xfrm_trans_queue_net(xs_net(x), skb, esp_output_tcp_encap_cb);
+	local_bh_enable();
+
+	/* EINPROGRESS just happens to do the right thing.  It
+	 * actually means that the skb has been consumed and
+	 * isn't coming back.
+	 */
+	return err ?: -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+#endif
+
 static void esp_output_done(struct crypto_async_request *base, int err)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb = base->data;
@@ -149,7 +274,13 @@ static void esp_output_done(struct crypto_async_request *base, int err)
 		secpath_reset(skb);
 		xfrm_dev_resume(skb);
 	} else {
-		xfrm_output_resume(skb, err);
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+		if (!err &&
+		    x->encap && x->encap->encap_type == TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP)
+			esp_output_tail_tcp(x, skb);
+		else
+#endif
+			xfrm_output_resume(skb, err);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -238,7 +369,7 @@ static struct ip_esp_hdr *esp_output_udp_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	unsigned int len;
 
 	len = skb->len + esp->tailen - skb_transport_offset(skb);
-	if (len + sizeof(struct iphdr) >= IP_MAX_MTU)
+	if (len + sizeof(struct iphdr) > IP_MAX_MTU)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
 
 	uh = (struct udphdr *)esp->esph;
@@ -258,6 +389,23 @@ static struct ip_esp_hdr *esp_output_udp_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(uh + 1);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+static struct ip_esp_hdr *esp_output_tcp_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					       struct esp_info *esp)
+{
+	__be16 *lenp = (void *)esp->esph;
+	unsigned int len;
+
+	len = skb->len + esp->tailen - skb_transport_offset(skb);
+	if (len > IP_MAX_MTU)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
+
+	*lenp = htons(len);
+
+	return (struct ip_esp_hdr *)(lenp + 1);
+}
+#endif
+
 static int esp_output_encap(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			    struct esp_info *esp)
 {
@@ -278,6 +426,22 @@ static int esp_output_encap(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE:
 		esph = esp_output_udp_encap(skb, encap_type, esp, sport, dport);
 		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+	case TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP: {
+		struct sock *sk;
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		sk = esp_find_tcp_sk(x);
+		if (IS_ERR(sk)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return PTR_ERR(sk);
+		}
+
+		esph = esp_output_tcp_encap(skb, esp);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		break;
+	}
+#endif
 	}
 
 	if (IS_ERR(esph))
@@ -298,7 +462,7 @@ int esp_output_head(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
 	struct sk_buff *trailer;
 	int tailen = esp->tailen;
 
-	/* this is non-NULL only with UDP Encapsulation */
+	/* this is non-NULL only with TCP/UDP Encapsulation */
 	if (x->encap) {
 		int err = esp_output_encap(x, skb, esp);
 
@@ -493,6 +657,11 @@ int esp_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
 	if (sg != dsg)
 		esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+	if (!err && x->encap && x->encap->encap_type == TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP)
+		err = esp_output_tail_tcp(x, skb);
+#endif
+
 error_free:
 	kfree(tmp);
 error:
@@ -619,10 +788,16 @@ int esp_input_done2(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
 
 	if (x->encap) {
 		struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap = x->encap;
+		struct tcphdr *th = (void *)(skb_network_header(skb) + ihl);
 		struct udphdr *uh = (void *)(skb_network_header(skb) + ihl);
 		__be16 source;
 
 		switch (x->encap->encap_type) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+		case TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP:
+			source = th->source;
+			break;
+#endif
 		case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP:
 		case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE:
 			source = uh->source;
@@ -1041,6 +1216,14 @@ static int esp_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
 		case UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE:
 			x->props.header_len += sizeof(struct udphdr) + 2 * sizeof(u32);
 			break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+		case TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP:
+			/* only the length field, TCP encap is done by
+			 * the socket
+			 */
+			x->props.header_len += 2;
+			break;
+#endif
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/net/xfrm/Kconfig b/net/xfrm/Kconfig
index c967fc3c38c8..ccc012b3ea10 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/Kconfig
+++ b/net/xfrm/Kconfig
@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ config XFRM_IPCOMP
 	select CRYPTO
 	select CRYPTO_DEFLATE
 
+config XFRM_ESPINTCP
+	bool "ESP in TCP encapsulation (RFC 8229)"
+	depends on XFRM && INET_ESP
+	select STREAM_PARSER
+	help
+	  Support for RFC 8229 encapsulation of ESP and IKE over TCP sockets.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config NET_KEY
 	tristate "PF_KEY sockets"
 	select XFRM_ALGO
diff --git a/net/xfrm/Makefile b/net/xfrm/Makefile
index fbc4552d17b8..2d4bb4b9f75e 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/Makefile
+++ b/net/xfrm/Makefile
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XFRM_ALGO) += xfrm_algo.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_XFRM_USER) += xfrm_user.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_XFRM_IPCOMP) += xfrm_ipcomp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE) += xfrm_interface.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP) += espintcp.o
diff --git a/net/xfrm/espintcp.c b/net/xfrm/espintcp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d561a00c4b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/xfrm/espintcp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <net/tcp.h>
+#include <net/strparser.h>
+#include <net/xfrm.h>
+#include <net/esp.h>
+#include <net/espintcp.h>
+#include <linux/skmsg.h>
+#include <net/inet_common.h>
+
+static void handle_nonesp(struct espintcp_ctx *ctx, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			  struct sock *sk)
+{
+	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) >= sk->sk_rcvbuf ||
+	    !sk_rmem_schedule(sk, skb, skb->truesize)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
+
+	memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(skb->cb));
+	skb_queue_tail(&ctx->ike_queue, skb);
+	ctx->saved_data_ready(sk);
+}
+
+static void handle_esp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
+{
+	skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
+	memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(skb->cb));
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	skb->dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(sock_net(sk), skb->skb_iif);
+	local_bh_disable();
+	xfrm4_rcv_encap(skb, IPPROTO_ESP, 0, TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP);
+	local_bh_enable();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void espintcp_rcv(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = container_of(strp, struct espintcp_ctx,
+						strp);
+	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
+	u32 nonesp_marker;
+	int err;
+
+	err = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset + 2, &nonesp_marker,
+			    sizeof(nonesp_marker));
+	if (err < 0) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* remove header, leave non-ESP marker/SPI */
+	if (!__pskb_pull(skb, rxm->offset + 2)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (pskb_trim(skb, rxm->full_len - 2) != 0) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (nonesp_marker == 0)
+		handle_nonesp(ctx, skb, strp->sk);
+	else
+		handle_esp(skb, strp->sk);
+}
+
+static int espintcp_parse(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
+	__be16 blen;
+	u16 len;
+	int err;
+
+	if (skb->len < rxm->offset + 2)
+		return 0;
+
+	err = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, &blen, sizeof(blen));
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
+
+	len = be16_to_cpu(blen);
+	if (len < 6)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+static int espintcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+			    int nonblock, int flags, int *addr_len)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int err = 0;
+	int copied;
+	int off = 0;
+
+	flags |= nonblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0;
+
+	skb = __skb_recv_datagram(sk, &ctx->ike_queue, flags, NULL, &off, &err);
+	if (!skb)
+		return err;
+
+	copied = len;
+	if (copied > skb->len)
+		copied = skb->len;
+	else if (copied < skb->len)
+		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
+
+	err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, 0, msg, copied);
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	if (flags & MSG_TRUNC)
+		copied = skb->len;
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+	return copied;
+}
+
+int espintcp_queue_out(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+
+	if (skb_queue_len(&ctx->out_queue) >= netdev_max_backlog)
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+
+	__skb_queue_tail(&ctx->out_queue, skb);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espintcp_queue_out);
+
+/* espintcp length field is 2B and length includes the length field's size */
+#define MAX_ESPINTCP_MSG (((1 << 16) - 1) - 2)
+
+static int espintcp_sendskb_locked(struct sock *sk, struct espintcp_msg *emsg,
+				   int flags)
+{
+	do {
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = skb_send_sock_locked(sk, emsg->skb,
+					   emsg->offset, emsg->len);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
+		emsg->len -= ret;
+		emsg->offset += ret;
+	} while (emsg->len > 0);
+
+	kfree_skb(emsg->skb);
+	memset(emsg, 0, sizeof(*emsg));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int espintcp_sendskmsg_locked(struct sock *sk,
+				     struct espintcp_msg *emsg, int flags)
+{
+	struct sk_msg *skmsg = &emsg->skmsg;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
+	int done = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
+	sg = &skmsg->sg.data[skmsg->sg.start];
+	do {
+		size_t size = sg->length - emsg->offset;
+		int offset = sg->offset + emsg->offset;
+		struct page *p;
+
+		emsg->offset = 0;
+
+		if (sg_is_last(sg))
+			flags &= ~MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
+
+		p = sg_page(sg);
+retry:
+		ret = do_tcp_sendpages(sk, p, offset, size, flags);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			emsg->offset = offset - sg->offset;
+			skmsg->sg.start += done;
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		if (ret != size) {
+			offset += ret;
+			size -= ret;
+			goto retry;
+		}
+
+		done++;
+		put_page(p);
+		sk_mem_uncharge(sk, sg->length);
+		sg = sg_next(sg);
+	} while (sg);
+
+	memset(emsg, 0, sizeof(*emsg));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int espintcp_push_msgs(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct espintcp_msg *emsg = &ctx->partial;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!emsg->len)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (ctx->tx_running)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	ctx->tx_running = 1;
+
+	if (emsg->skb)
+		err = espintcp_sendskb_locked(sk, emsg, 0);
+	else
+		err = espintcp_sendskmsg_locked(sk, emsg, 0);
+	if (err == -EAGAIN) {
+		ctx->tx_running = 0;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (!err)
+		memset(emsg, 0, sizeof(*emsg));
+
+	ctx->tx_running = 0;
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+int espintcp_push_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct espintcp_msg *emsg = &ctx->partial;
+	unsigned int len;
+	int offset;
+
+	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -ECONNRESET;
+	}
+
+	offset = skb_transport_offset(skb);
+	len = skb->len - offset;
+
+	espintcp_push_msgs(sk);
+
+	if (emsg->len) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+	}
+
+	skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk);
+
+	emsg->offset = offset;
+	emsg->len = len;
+	emsg->skb = skb;
+
+	espintcp_push_msgs(sk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espintcp_push_skb);
+
+static int espintcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
+{
+	long timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct espintcp_msg *emsg = &ctx->partial;
+	struct iov_iter pfx_iter;
+	struct kvec pfx_iov = {};
+	size_t msglen = size + 2;
+	char buf[2] = {0};
+	int err, end;
+
+	if (msg->msg_flags)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (size > MAX_ESPINTCP_MSG)
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	if (msg->msg_controllen)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+
+	err = espintcp_push_msgs(sk);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		err = -ENOBUFS;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	sk_msg_init(&emsg->skmsg);
+	while (1) {
+		/* only -ENOMEM is possible since we don't coalesce */
+		err = sk_msg_alloc(sk, &emsg->skmsg, msglen, 0);
+		if (!err)
+			break;
+
+		err = sk_stream_wait_memory(sk, &timeo);
+		if (err)
+			goto fail;
+	}
+
+	*((__be16 *)buf) = cpu_to_be16(msglen);
+	pfx_iov.iov_base = buf;
+	pfx_iov.iov_len = sizeof(buf);
+	iov_iter_kvec(&pfx_iter, WRITE, &pfx_iov, 1, pfx_iov.iov_len);
+
+	err = sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(sk, &pfx_iter, &emsg->skmsg,
+				       pfx_iov.iov_len);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(sk, &msg->msg_iter, &emsg->skmsg, size);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto fail;
+
+	end = emsg->skmsg.sg.end;
+	emsg->len = size;
+	sk_msg_iter_var_prev(end);
+	sg_mark_end(sk_msg_elem(&emsg->skmsg, end));
+
+	tcp_rate_check_app_limited(sk);
+
+	err = espintcp_push_msgs(sk);
+	/* this message could be partially sent, keep it */
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto unlock;
+	release_sock(sk);
+
+	return size;
+
+fail:
+	sk_msg_free(sk, &emsg->skmsg);
+	memset(emsg, 0, sizeof(*emsg));
+unlock:
+	release_sock(sk);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static struct proto espintcp_prot __ro_after_init;
+static struct proto_ops espintcp_ops __ro_after_init;
+
+static void espintcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+
+	strp_data_ready(&ctx->strp);
+}
+
+static void espintcp_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = container_of(work,
+						struct espintcp_ctx, work);
+	struct sock *sk = ctx->strp.sk;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	if (!ctx->tx_running)
+		espintcp_push_msgs(sk);
+	release_sock(sk);
+}
+
+static void espintcp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+
+	schedule_work(&ctx->work);
+	ctx->saved_write_space(sk);
+}
+
+static void espintcp_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+
+	kfree(ctx);
+}
+
+bool tcp_is_ulp_esp(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return sk->sk_prot == &espintcp_prot;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_is_ulp_esp);
+
+static int espintcp_init_sk(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
+	struct strp_callbacks cb = {
+		.rcv_msg = espintcp_rcv,
+		.parse_msg = espintcp_parse,
+	};
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	err = strp_init(&ctx->strp, sk, &cb);
+	if (err)
+		goto free;
+
+	__sk_dst_reset(sk);
+
+	strp_check_rcv(&ctx->strp);
+	skb_queue_head_init(&ctx->ike_queue);
+	skb_queue_head_init(&ctx->out_queue);
+	sk->sk_prot = &espintcp_prot;
+	sk->sk_socket->ops = &espintcp_ops;
+	ctx->saved_data_ready = sk->sk_data_ready;
+	ctx->saved_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
+	sk->sk_data_ready = espintcp_data_ready;
+	sk->sk_write_space = espintcp_write_space;
+	sk->sk_destruct = espintcp_destruct;
+	icsk->icsk_ulp_data = ctx;
+	INIT_WORK(&ctx->work, espintcp_tx_work);
+
+	/* avoid using task_frag */
+	sk->sk_allocation = GFP_ATOMIC;
+
+	return 0;
+
+free:
+	kfree(ctx);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void espintcp_release(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct sk_buff_head queue;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	__skb_queue_head_init(&queue);
+	skb_queue_splice_init(&ctx->out_queue, &queue);
+
+	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue)))
+		espintcp_push_skb(sk, skb);
+
+	tcp_release_cb(sk);
+}
+
+static void espintcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
+{
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+	struct espintcp_msg *emsg = &ctx->partial;
+
+	strp_stop(&ctx->strp);
+
+	sk->sk_prot = &tcp_prot;
+	barrier();
+
+	cancel_work_sync(&ctx->work);
+	strp_done(&ctx->strp);
+
+	skb_queue_purge(&ctx->out_queue);
+	skb_queue_purge(&ctx->ike_queue);
+
+	if (emsg->len) {
+		if (emsg->skb)
+			kfree_skb(emsg->skb);
+		else
+			sk_msg_free(sk, &emsg->skmsg);
+	}
+
+	tcp_close(sk, timeout);
+}
+
+static __poll_t espintcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
+			      poll_table *wait)
+{
+	__poll_t mask = datagram_poll(file, sock, wait);
+	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+	struct espintcp_ctx *ctx = espintcp_getctx(sk);
+
+	if (!skb_queue_empty(&ctx->ike_queue))
+		mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+
+static struct tcp_ulp_ops espintcp_ulp __read_mostly = {
+	.name = "espintcp",
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.init = espintcp_init_sk,
+};
+
+void __init espintcp_init(void)
+{
+	memcpy(&espintcp_prot, &tcp_prot, sizeof(tcp_prot));
+	memcpy(&espintcp_ops, &inet_stream_ops, sizeof(inet_stream_ops));
+	espintcp_prot.sendmsg = espintcp_sendmsg;
+	espintcp_prot.recvmsg = espintcp_recvmsg;
+	espintcp_prot.close = espintcp_close;
+	espintcp_prot.release_cb = espintcp_release;
+	espintcp_ops.poll = espintcp_poll;
+
+	tcp_register_ulp(&espintcp_ulp);
+}
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 1070dfece76b..893072f2e651 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_STATISTICS
 #include <net/snmp.h>
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+#include <net/espintcp.h>
+#endif
 
 #include "xfrm_hash.h"
 
@@ -4156,6 +4159,10 @@ void __init xfrm_init(void)
 	seqcount_init(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 	xfrm_input_init();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP
+	espintcp_init();
+#endif
+
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(xfrm_if_cb, NULL);
 	synchronize_rcu();
 }
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index fd51737f9f17..07233a707b5b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ int __xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
 		net->xfrm.state_num--;
 		spin_unlock(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
 
+		if (x->encap_sk)
+			sock_put(rcu_dereference_raw(x->encap_sk));
+
 		xfrm_dev_state_delete(x);
 
 		/* All xfrm_state objects are created by xfrm_state_alloc.
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229)
  2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 7/7] xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-08-16 14:18 ` Sabrina Dubroca
  2019-08-21  6:59   ` Steffen Klassert
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-08-16 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, Steffen Klassert; +Cc: Herbert Xu

Hi Steffen,

2019-06-25, 12:11:33 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> This patchset introduces support for TCP encapsulation of IKE and ESP
> messages, as defined by RFC 8229 [0]. It is an evolution of what
> Herbert Xu proposed in January 2018 [1] that addresses the main
> criticism against it, by not interfering with the TCP implementation
> at all. The networking stack now has infrastructure for this: TCP ULPs
> and Stream Parsers.

Have you had a chance to look at this?  I was going to rebase and
resend, but the patches still apply to ipsec-next and net-next (patch
2 is already in net-next as commit bd95e678e0f6).

Thanks,

-- 
Sabrina

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229)
  2019-08-16 14:18 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support " Sabrina Dubroca
@ 2019-08-21  6:59   ` Steffen Klassert
  2019-08-21 10:17     ` Sabrina Dubroca
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2019-08-21  6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sabrina Dubroca; +Cc: netdev, Herbert Xu

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> 2019-06-25, 12:11:33 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > This patchset introduces support for TCP encapsulation of IKE and ESP
> > messages, as defined by RFC 8229 [0]. It is an evolution of what
> > Herbert Xu proposed in January 2018 [1] that addresses the main
> > criticism against it, by not interfering with the TCP implementation
> > at all. The networking stack now has infrastructure for this: TCP ULPs
> > and Stream Parsers.
> 
> Have you had a chance to look at this?  I was going to rebase and
> resend, but the patches still apply to ipsec-next and net-next (patch
> 2 is already in net-next as commit bd95e678e0f6).

I had a look and I have no general objection against this. If you
think the patchset is ready for inclusion, just remove the RFC and
resend it. I'll have a closer on it look then.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229)
  2019-08-21  6:59   ` Steffen Klassert
@ 2019-08-21 10:17     ` Sabrina Dubroca
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2019-08-21 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steffen Klassert; +Cc: netdev, Herbert Xu

2019-08-21, 08:59:11 +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > Hi Steffen,
> > 
> > 2019-06-25, 12:11:33 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > This patchset introduces support for TCP encapsulation of IKE and ESP
> > > messages, as defined by RFC 8229 [0]. It is an evolution of what
> > > Herbert Xu proposed in January 2018 [1] that addresses the main
> > > criticism against it, by not interfering with the TCP implementation
> > > at all. The networking stack now has infrastructure for this: TCP ULPs
> > > and Stream Parsers.
> > 
> > Have you had a chance to look at this?  I was going to rebase and
> > resend, but the patches still apply to ipsec-next and net-next (patch
> > 2 is already in net-next as commit bd95e678e0f6).
> 
> I had a look and I have no general objection against this. If you
> think the patchset is ready for inclusion, just remove the RFC and
> resend it. I'll have a closer on it look then.

Ok, thanks, I'll repost.

-- 
Sabrina

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-21 10:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-25 10:11 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 1/7] net: add queue argument to __skb_wait_for_more_packets and __skb_{,try_}recv_datagram Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 2/7] skbuff: Avoid sleeping in skb_send_sock_locked Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 3/7] xfrm: introduce xfrm_trans_queue_net Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 4/7] xfrm: add route lookup to xfrm4_rcv_encap Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 5/7] esp4: prepare esp_input_done2 for non-UDP encapsulation Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 6/7] esp4: split esp_output_udp_encap and introduce esp_output_encap Sabrina Dubroca
2019-06-25 10:11 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 7/7] xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229) Sabrina Dubroca
2019-08-16 14:18 ` [PATCH RFC ipsec-next 0/7] ipsec: add TCP encapsulation support " Sabrina Dubroca
2019-08-21  6:59   ` Steffen Klassert
2019-08-21 10:17     ` Sabrina Dubroca

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).