From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: setup SERDES irq also for CPU/DSA ports
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:15:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190817201552.06c39d3e@nic.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190817200342.567c13c4@nic.cz>
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:03:42 +0200
Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz> wrote:
> One way would be to rename the mv88e6xxx_setup_port function to
> mv88e6xxx_setup_port_regs, or mv88e6xxx_port_pre_setup, or something
> like that. Would the names mv88e6xxx_port_setup and
> mv88e6xxx_setup_port_regs still be very confusing and error prone?
> I think maybe yes...
>
> Other solution would be to, instead of the .port_setup()
> and .port_teardown() DSA ops, create the .after_setup()
> and .before_teardown() ops I mentioned in the previous mail.
>
> And yet another (in my opinion very improper) solution could be that
> the .setup() method could call dsa_port_setup() from within itself, to
> ensure that the needed structres exist.
I thought of another solution, one that does not need new DSA
operations. What if dsa_port_enable was called for CPU/DSA ports after
in dsa_port_setup_switches, after all ports are setup, and
dsa_port_disable called for CPU/DSA ports in dsa_port_teardown_switches?
This seems to me as cleaner solution.
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-17 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 15:08 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] mv88e6xxx: setting 2500base-x mode for CPU/DSA port in dts Marek Behún
2019-08-16 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support 2500base-x in SGMII IRQ handler Marek Behún
2019-08-16 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: add port_setup/port_teardown methods to DSA ops Marek Behún
2019-08-16 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: setup SERDES irq also for CPU/DSA ports Marek Behún
2019-08-16 16:25 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-16 17:05 ` Marek Behun
2019-08-16 23:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-17 18:03 ` Marek Behun
2019-08-17 18:15 ` Marek Behun [this message]
2019-08-17 19:27 ` Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190817201552.06c39d3e@nic.cz \
--to=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).