From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@metanetworks.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] test_bpf: Add an skb_segment test for a linear head_frag=0 skb whose gso_size was mangled
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:13:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829121344.20675-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> (raw)
Following reports of skb_segment() hitting a BUG_ON when working on
GROed skbs which have their gso_size mangled (e.g. after a
bpf_skb_change_proto call), add a reproducer test that mimics the
input skbs that lead to the mentioned BUG_ON as in [1].
Currently, this new test *INDEED* hits the BUG_ON, therefore the final
patch is to be applied only after skb_segment is fixed.
When changing the gso_size of the test skb to its original value (+20
bytes) then the test passes successfully.
[1] https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2019/08/26/110
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Shmulik Ladkani (2):
test_bpf: Refactor test_skb_segment() to allow testing skb_segment()
on numerous different skbs
test_bpf: Introduce 'gso_linear_no_head_frag' skb_segment test
lib/test_bpf.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 12:13 Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2019-08-29 12:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] test_bpf: Refactor test_skb_segment() to allow testing skb_segment() on numerous different skbs Shmulik Ladkani
2019-08-29 12:13 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] test_bpf: Introduce 'gso_linear_no_head_frag' skb_segment test Shmulik Ladkani
2019-09-09 1:41 ` [test_bpf] f1f1a8af9e: kernel_BUG_at_net/core/skbuff.c kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829121344.20675-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--to=shmulik@metanetworks.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).