Hi Vladimir,

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I did something similar in v1 with a .port_setup_taprio in "[RFC PATCH
> net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Pass tc-taprio offload to drivers".

Okay, didn't see that one.

> Would this address Ilias's comment about DSA not really needing to
> have this level of awareness into the qdisc offload type? Rightfully I
> can agree that the added-value of making a .port_set_schedule and
> .port_del_schedule in DSA compared to simply passing the ndo_setup_tc
> is not that great.

I wanted to avoid that drivers have to the same kind of work, and it put
it therefore into the core part. However, I agree that the added-value
is not that high for TAPRIO.

>
> By the way, thanks for the iproute2 patch for parsing 64-bit base time
> on ARM 32, saved me a bit of debugging time :)

No problem :). That cost me a bit of time.

> Regards,
> -Vladimir

Thanks,
Kurt